Re: Vigour or vitality
Subject: | Re: Vigour or vitality |
|
---|---|---|
From: | Alan Reeves | |
Date: | Jun 25 2001 19:19:22 |
--- Mike Ellison <Mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.demon.co.uk> wrote:
Please excuse me for withdrawing my head from my arboricultural bottom for a moment, but your (and if my memory serves me correctly, Dr. Shigo's) definitions of 'vigour' and 'vitality' are actually contrary to current English usage.
I'd like to think that that's where misconceptions arise - not your arb. bottom, but common english usage, Mike. Time to go back to basics and rethink rituals of walking round a tree three times and pontificating about vigour? How was Silwood? Got an article for me??7 ===== Alan Reeves 27 Garstang Road North Wesham Kirkham Lancashire PR4 3DB 01772 XXXXXX 07971 XXXXXX ____________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie The UK Tree Care mailing list - http://uktc.oak-wood.co.uk/ To unsubscribe send mailto:unsubscribe-uktc@xxxxxxxxx.co.uk To change your subscription options visit http://uktc.oak-wood.co.uk/admin/
Current thread
- Vigour or vitality
Jun 21 2001 15:45:38- Re: Vigour or vitality
Jun 24 2001 18:48:14- RE: Vigour or vitality
Jun 25 2001 06:18:43
- RE: Vigour or vitality
- RE: Vigour or vitality
Jun 21 2001 17:15:49- RE: Vigour or vitality
Jun 21 2001 22:38:12- Re: Vigour or vitality
Jun 22 2001 07:48:38- Re: Vigour or vitality
Jun 22 2001 23:34:18
- Re: Vigour or vitality
- Re: Vigour or vitality
- Re: Vigour or vitality
Jun 25 2001 16:54:14- Re: Vigour or vitality
Jun 25 2001 19:19:22
- Re: Vigour or vitality
- RE: Vigour or vitality
- Re: Vigour or vitality
Jun 21 2001 21:01:02 - RE: Vigour or vitality
Jun 22 2001 08:48:42- RE: Vigour or vitality
Jun 24 2001 17:43:10
- RE: Vigour or vitality
- RE: Vigour or vitality
Jun 22 2001 09:33:42- Re: Vigour or vitality
Jun 22 2001 11:33:47- Re: ISA journal postage
Jun 22 2001 19:29:06
- Re: ISA journal postage
- Re: Vigour or vitality
- Re: Vigour or vitality
Jun 25 2001 19:34:23- Re: Vigour or vitality
Jun 25 2001 20:14:27
- Re: Vigour or vitality
- Re: Vigour or vitality