Supported by the Arborcentre

UKTC Archive

tree-care.info for tree advice

Re: To TPO or not to TPO that is the question!

Subject: Re: To TPO or not to TPO that is the question!
From: Jim Quaife
Date: Mar 30 2002 14:51:20
Title: To TPO or not to TPO that is the question!
Julian,
On this one I have to insist.  If the only criterion for a CA is trees, they should be the subject of a TPO. My reading of 9.1 is that trees may make a contribution and indeed usually do. To be fair, I have no personal experience of extant tree-only CAs, nor of a CA being made solely due to trees.  I would be most interested if there are in fact any examples.
I recall one instance a few years ago now where a CA included the grounds of a large house that had subsequently burnt down.  The house was never rebuilt such that the land use was deemed to have been "abandoned" (a term that keeps planning lawyers in Jaguars!) and as a consequence the property was only trees.  However, as it was only part of a wider CA (they usually cover an area rather than an individual property) there was no particular anomaly.  I suspect that the opportunity to sort it out will be taken with the Local Plan review.
Jim Q
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: To TPO or not to TPO that is the question!

Jim -
 
We're back to the Blue Book again: look at para. 9.1
 
If you mean that trees cannot be an exclusive reason for CA designation, then perhaps you are right, though I doubt it as, from memory the Planning (Listed Buildings and Cons. Areas) Act is pretty vague and not, I think prescriptive.
 
They can certainly be a factor though.
 
J.
 

Current thread