Re: Whose amenity?
| Subject: | Re: Whose amenity? |
|
|---|---|---|
| From: | Ian MAY | |
| Date: | Jul 10 2002 12:03:01 |
"Andersonarb@xxxx.com" 07/10/02 09:06am >>>wrote;
In a message dated 09/07/02 19:27:02 GMT Daylight Time, dscottcul@xxxx.net writes:
"trees are long-lived community assets."
Another nice peice of phraseology for us all to note and use at a later date.
Thanks Scott.
Bill.
.This should perhaps read "trees are long-lived community assets, liabilities,
or both." depending on your viewpoint.
Ian..........
--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxx.co.uk
Current thread
- Whose amenity? continued
- Re: Whose amenity?
Jul 09 2002 17:14:12 - Re: Whose amenity?
Jul 09 2002 17:17:54 - Whose amenity?
Jul 10 2002 06:36:47 - Whose amenity?
Jul 10 2002 06:36:47- Re: Whose amenity?
Jul 10 2002 11:38:48- Re: Whose amenity?
Jul 11 2002 11:21:08
- Re: Whose amenity?
- Re: Whose amenity?
- Re: Whose amenity?
Jul 10 2002 08:06:16 - RE: Whose amenity?
Jul 10 2002 10:54:53 - Re: Whose amenity?
Jul 10 2002 12:03:01- Re: Whose amenity?
Jul 10 2002 12:42:46
- Re: Whose amenity?
- Re: Whose amenity?
Jul 10 2002 17:57:17 - RE: Whose amenity?
Jul 11 2002 08:41:17 - Whose amenity?
Jul 11 2002 09:01:13 - RE: Whose amenity?
Jul 11 2002 10:21:45- Re: Whose amenity?
Jul 12 2002 08:06:07
- Re: Whose amenity?
- Re: Whose amenity?
Jul 11 2002 11:05:11 - Re: Whose amenity?
Jul 11 2002 12:21:45
- Re: Whose amenity?