UKTC Archive

Re: mischievous applications

Subject: Re: mischievous applications
From: Edmund Hopkins
Date: Dec 23 2002 11:15:12
Chris Hastie <c.hastie@xxxxxxxxx.co.uk> wrote:


Is the tree worth an Article 5 Edmund?  The other thing I wonder, given
how short the timescale since the last app, is if you actually have to
accept it? If it's not materially
different from the previous application can you not just say "go away"?

No its nowhere near an article 5 and yes I think we could reasonably say "Go
away", but I posted my question hoping for advice on whether the LPA can
refuse to book in the application. Dominic's example was helpful though I
see you (Dom) went to several appeals, and kept booking in the apps and
doing the site visits. Its not the question of liability which bothers me
but the mischievous waste of time.

Edmund Hopkins
Arboricultural Officer



***************************************************************************
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal
views which are not the views of Nottingham City Council unless specifically
stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system,
do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance
on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that Nottingham City
Council monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will
signify your consent to this.
***************************************************************************


-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxx.co.uk