RE: mischievous applications
| Subject: | RE: mischievous applications |
|---|---|
| From: | Dominic Scanlon |
| Date: | Dec 23 2002 15:55:54 |
Ben wrote
Refuse to deal with subsequent applications (after two
refusals and within a
reasonable timescale). Write to the applicant advising this
position and
stating that should an appeal be made on the grounds of non
determination
the LPA will elect to have the matter dealt with by Informal
Hearing or
Public Inquiry and will make an application for costs to
recover reasonable
expenses.
Dead right - our Local Government Office did suggest a
public enquiry as a way of addressing this problem.
Dom
--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxx.co.uk
Information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are
not the intended recipient please notify the sender, and please delete the
message from your system immediately. This e-mail and any attachments have
been checked for viruses however you should carry out your own check before
opening any of the attachments.
--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxx.co.uk
Current thread
- mischievous applications continued
- RE: mischievous applications
Dec 23 2002 09:41:15 - RE: mischievous applications
Dec 23 2002 10:02:31 - RE: mischievous applications
Dec 23 2002 10:07:51 - RE: mischievous applications
Dec 23 2002 11:29:54- Re: mischievous applications
Dec 23 2002 11:51:19
- Re: mischievous applications
- RE: mischievous applications
Dec 23 2002 11:56:54 - Re: mischievous applications
Dec 23 2002 12:38:17 - RE: mischievous applications
Dec 23 2002 13:57:27 - RE: mischievous applications
Dec 23 2002 15:55:54 - RE: mischievous applications
Dec 23 2002 16:25:33 - RE: mischievous applications
Dec 24 2002 09:41:27 - Re: mischievous applications
Dec 27 2002 21:27:53 - Re: mischievous applications
Dec 29 2002 12:37:33
- RE: mischievous applications