Supported by the Arborcentre

UKTC Archive

tree-care.info for tree advice

Re: PICUS

Subject: Re: PICUS
From: Liz Gilbert
Date: Feb 12 2003 14:07:58
Hi Scott
Tt is the distance that the sound wave travels that you measure and not the
arc.
Liz

From: "Scott Cullen" <dscottcul@xxxx.net>
Reply-To: uktc@xxxxxxxxx.co.uk
To: UK Tree Care <uktc@xxxxxxxxx.co.uk>
Subject: Re: PICUS
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 07:14:31 -0500

Liz it pretty clear, but can you confirm, you need the chord distance
(distance across) not the arc (distance along the circumference)?  This
would be the distance traveled by the sound wave.

While larger trees might be less commonly encountered they are the ones
with
the potentially greatest value and attached public sentiment. These are
the
ones where we need the nest information and where we might be most
concerned
about the negative impacts of drilling.  (If we have a common roadside tree
24" in dia. which is 0.01% of our population and we reduce its life by 10
years by drilling in order to determine it's OK to leave in place, who
cares?  The public interest is best served.  If, by contrast we have a one
of a kind historic specimen 5' across is it acceptable to take 100 years
off
its life by drilling if we can get an acceptable picture with PICUS?)

So I think the practitioner would really want to know the proper procedures
for calibrating the instrument for big trees.  I imagine you could
approximate dia from different aspects to do a scale drawing or with a
transit instrument do it quite precisely.  The PICUS web site does not give
any detail on this.  I haven't had time to dig out any of Stefan Rust's
papers to see if it addressed there.

Scott Cullen




_________________________________________________________________
Stay in touch with MSN Messenger http://messenger.msn.co.uk


--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxx.co.uk



Current thread

  • RE: PICUS continued
        • Re: PICUS
          Scott Cullen, Feb 05 2003 17:29:52
          • Re: PICUS
            Julian or Kathy Dunster, Feb 05 2003 19:24:53
    • Re: PICUS
      Liz Gilbert, Feb 06 2003 11:45:13
    • RE: PICUS
      Lothar Göcke argus, Feb 10 2003 13:53:40
      • Re: PICUS
        Julian or Kathy Dunster, Feb 10 2003 15:12:25
    • Re: PICUS
      Liz Gilbert, Feb 12 2003 09:43:54
      • Re: PICUS
        Scott Cullen, Feb 12 2003 12:14:48
        • Re: PICUS
          Scott Cullen, Feb 12 2003 12:36:03
    • Re: PICUS
      Liz Gilbert, Feb 12 2003 14:07:58
    • Re: PICUS
      Lothar Göcke argus, Feb 13 2003 13:24:41
    • Picus
      Scott-Ellis, Tim, Sep 19 2003 07:03:24
    • Re: Picus
      Ian . Brewster, Sep 19 2003 13:26:28
    • Re: Picus
      David . Archer, Sep 25 2003 07:43:19