T-Officers,
Not sure on peoples consideration to this, but the below section of the
British standards, states a third of the protection zone can be removed as
long as there is a corresponding increase in the other direction. This is
good however, then the other side happens to be a road, and public footpath,
this is pointless is it not? Would anyone have a good case or possible words
to fight back with!
Ryan N
7.5.5 If it is deemed acceptable for construction works to occur closer than
the minimum distance, the distance can be reduced by up to one-third on one
side only. if distances are reduced in this way, a corresponding increase in
distances should be made in other directions.
****************************************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain information
which is privileged and confidential, the disclosure of which is
prohibited by law and intended solely for the use of the individual or
entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in
error please note any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
message is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately
if you have received this email by mistake and delete it from your
system.
Email transmissions cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as
information can be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late
or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message
which arise as a result of email transmission. If verification is
required please request a hard copy version.
Thank you for your co-operation.
****************************************************************************************
--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info
