RE: Resistograph
| Subject: | RE: Resistograph |
|
|---|---|---|
| From: | Scanlon, Dominic | |
| Date: | Jan 30 2004 09:31:47 |
Chris wrote: <I understood part of the point to be to check that the sound wood which you hope is holding the tree up is actually sound and showing no strength loss.> Sorry to labour the point Chris - but consider the scenario - you suspect decay in a tree, you drill with the RG and find a good level of sound wood and a smallish decay pocket. You think this justifies keeping the tree. So you take a core and test it with the Fractometer. What is the fractometer telling you that the RG isn't? If your reading showed sound wood why test a core? Or is the Fractometer able to pick up weakness not visible in an RG reading? Or is it just a useful way of proving belt and braces in court etc? Dom -- The UK Tree Care mailing list To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
Current thread
- Resistograph continued
- RE: Resistograph
Jan 28 2004 09:27:19 - RE: Resistograph
Jan 28 2004 13:12:43- RE: Resistograph
Jan 28 2004 15:26:00
- RE: Resistograph
- RE: Resistograph
Jan 28 2004 15:47:46- RE: Resistograph
Jan 28 2004 16:42:51
- RE: Resistograph
- RE: Resistograph
Jan 28 2004 15:54:28- RE: Resistograph
Jan 28 2004 16:42:39
- RE: Resistograph
- RE: Resistograph
Jan 28 2004 15:59:41 - RE: Resistograph
Jan 30 2004 09:31:47 - RE: Resistograph
Jan 30 2004 12:01:38- RE: Resistograph
Jan 30 2004 12:17:38 - Work wanted
Jan 30 2004 15:16:29- Re: Work wanted
Jan 30 2004 16:45:58- RE: Work wanted
Jan 30 2004 20:02:13 - Re: Work wanted
Jan 30 2004 20:28:03 - RE: Work wanted
Jan 31 2004 11:03:36 - Re: Work wanted
Jan 31 2004 16:38:05
- RE: Work wanted
- Re: Work wanted
- RE: Resistograph
- RE: Resistograph