Supported by the Arborcentre

UKTC Archive

Top 21 Gardening Sites
tree-care.info for tree advice

RE: BS5837

Subject: RE: BS5837
From: chris.hastie
Date: Jan 04 2005 15:26:56
On 04 January 2005 15:12, Mike Ellison wrote:

 
Does anyone else have any views on the appalling quality of
the consultation
draft?


It certainly lacked any serious proof reading. In fact, it looked as if
it lacked any proof reading at all, which does make one wonder about the
effectiveness of the quality control systems in place at our national
standards organisation.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Any opinions expressed in the E-mail are those of the individual and 
not necessarily those of Warwick District Council. This E-mail and 
any files with it are confidential and solely for the use of the 
intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the 
person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, please 
be advised that you have received this E-mail in error and that any 
use is strictly prohibited.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/

Current thread

  • BS5837
    Mike Ellison, Jan 04 2005 15:11:57
    • Re: BS5837
      Tim Gould, Jan 04 2005 18:17:50
    • Re: BS5837
      Ben Holding, Jan 05 2005 13:20:01
    • RE: BS5837
      chris.hastie, Jan 04 2005 15:26:56
    • Re: BS5837
      Andersonarb, Jan 04 2005 19:56:08
    • RE: BS5837
      DCox, Jan 05 2005 08:59:34
    • RE: BS5837
      Coish, Neil, Jan 05 2005 10:04:19
    • Re: BS5837
      Ian MAY, Jan 05 2005 11:48:26
      • Re: BS5837
        Consulting Arborist Society, Jan 05 2005 14:06:20
    • BS5837
      Jim Quaife, Oct 02 2005 16:07:38
    • Re: BS5837
      Treesnibley, Oct 10 2005 11:01:22
    • Re: BS5837
      Andersonarb, Oct 10 2005 11:27:31