Supported by the Arborcentre

UKTC Archive

Top 21 Gardening Sites
tree-care.info for tree advice

Re: BS5837

Subject: Re: BS5837
From: Andersonarb
Date: Jan 04 2005 19:56:08
In a message dated 04/01/2005 18:17:57 GMT Standard Time, 
trees@xxxxxxxxx.co.uk writes:

This begs the question how many people who were interested in
commenting failed to do so because it was such an onerous task?

Well at least one. Having said that I noted Chris Hastie's comprehensive 
comments and decided that my 2 pennorth was probably worth less than that. 

Regarding your comments on readability Mike, Yeah, it was not a 'couldn't put 
it down' piece but I suspect it's only your familiarity with the old one that 
made that incarnation 'readable.'

My opinion of the BSI has not particularly been lifted since I last thought 
to have an opinion on them, although I have the greatest respect for the 
people 
sitting on (and off) the review committee....

Bill.


-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/


Current thread

  • BS5837
    Mike Ellison, Jan 04 2005 15:11:57
    • Re: BS5837
      Tim Gould, Jan 04 2005 18:17:50
    • Re: BS5837
      Ben Holding, Jan 05 2005 13:20:01
    • RE: BS5837
      chris.hastie, Jan 04 2005 15:26:56
    • Re: BS5837
      Andersonarb, Jan 04 2005 19:56:08
    • RE: BS5837
      DCox, Jan 05 2005 08:59:34
    • RE: BS5837
      Coish, Neil, Jan 05 2005 10:04:19
    • Re: BS5837
      Ian MAY, Jan 05 2005 11:48:26
      • Re: BS5837
        Consulting Arborist Society, Jan 05 2005 14:06:20
    • BS5837
      Jim Quaife, Oct 02 2005 16:07:38
    • Re: BS5837
      Treesnibley, Oct 10 2005 11:01:22
    • Re: BS5837
      Andersonarb, Oct 10 2005 11:27:31
    • Re: BS5837
      Treesnibley, Oct 10 2005 11:47:13