Re: BS5837
| Subject: | Re: BS5837 |
|---|---|
| From: | Ian MAY |
| Date: | Jan 05 2005 11:48:26 |
Happy new year to one and all, I think as Arbs one of our biggest failures hinges on our eclectic approach to almost everything (this is particularly true of LA TOs where constrained by local procedures). An updated BS 5837 gives us the chance to sing from the same song book and gives developers, countrywide parameters within which to design. It was always inevitable that some professionals would feel compelled to criticise this standard publicly for whatever reason (myself included) however at the end of this process we as an industry need to endorse the final document for it to have any chance of it being successful for the sake of what's left of our urban landscape. We have had our opportunity to give constructive criticism and now we must give the editors the space they need to do their best. Notwithstanding, whatever 5-legged Kangorillapig, that emerges out of the back of this, we must accept it and pledge our allegiance to it, otherwise we will remain divided and vulnerable. Regards Ian.................. >>> "Andersonarb@xxxx.com" 01/04/05 07:44pm >>> In a message dated 04/01/2005 18:17:57 GMT Standard Time, trees@xxxxxxxxx.co.uk writes:
This begs the question how many people who were interested incommenting failed to do so because it was such an onerous task?Well at least one. Having said that I noted Chris Hastie's comprehensive
comments and decided that my 2 pennorth was probably worth less than that.
Regarding your comments on readability Mike, Yeah, it was not a 'couldn't put
it down' piece but I suspect it's only your familiarity with the old one that
made that incarnation 'readable.'
My opinion of the BSI has not particularly been lifted since I last thought to
have an opinion on them, although I have the greatest respect for the people
sitting on (and off) the review committee....
Bill.
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info
The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
Current thread
- BS5837
Jan 04 2005 15:11:57- Re: BS5837
Jan 04 2005 18:17:50 - Re: BS5837
Jan 05 2005 13:20:01 - RE: BS5837
Jan 04 2005 15:26:56 - Re: BS5837
Jan 04 2005 19:56:08 - RE: BS5837
Jan 05 2005 08:59:34 - RE: BS5837
Jan 05 2005 10:04:19 - Re: BS5837
Jan 05 2005 11:48:26- Re: BS5837
Jan 05 2005 14:06:20
- Re: BS5837
- BS5837
Oct 02 2005 16:07:38 - Re: BS5837
Oct 10 2005 11:01:22 - Re: BS5837
Oct 10 2005 11:27:31 - Re: BS5837
Oct 10 2005 11:47:13
- Re: BS5837