______________________________________________________________________
TEP&Arb.Asoc. SEMINAR III & IV of SERIES
LIFE WITHIN & BENEATH THE TREE - 17th&18th Nov., Keele Conference Park.
Dr David Lonsdale, Dr Olaf Ribeiro, Dr Alan Rayner,Dr James Merryweather
WIND LOAD SIMULATION & TREE STATICS
Pollok Park-Glasgow, 1st&2nd Dec. Ashton Court-Bristol, 5th&6th Dec.
Dr Jaroslav Kolarik & Prof Petr Horacek
Bookings & info at http://www.treeworks.co.uk/seminars
______________________________________________________________________
I was always of the understanding that the courts would always assume that if
the 'intention' was to include the trees then they would be considered to be
covered by the TPO. For instance, if the tree owner, or previous owners have
made applications in the past, then I think there would be sufficient proof
that the intention was to protect these trees and that the owners understood
this. If they are arguing that the trees are outside a line, doesn't this
indicate that they consider them to be protected? They are surely arguing
whether the TPO is legal rather than the fact that they are not protected?
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Needham [mailto:Andrew.Needham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.gov.uk]
Sent: 06 October 2005 12:03
To: UK Tree Care
Subject: RE: TPO plan interpretation
______________________________________________________________________
TEP&Arb.Asoc. SEMINAR III & IV of SERIES
LIFE WITHIN & BENEATH THE TREE - 17th&18th Nov., Keele Conference Park.
Dr David Lonsdale, Dr Olaf Ribeiro, Dr Alan Rayner,Dr James Merryweather
WIND LOAD SIMULATION & TREE STATICS
Pollok Park-Glasgow, 1st&2nd Dec. Ashton Court-Bristol, 5th&6th Dec.
Dr Jaroslav Kolarik & Prof Petr Horacek
Bookings & info at http://www.treeworks.co.uk/seminars
______________________________________________________________________
" Ron wrote it's the outer edge of the thick line that defines the
boundary
Ron et al
This is also true of compartment delineation in conventional forestry
and so quite appropriate for urban forestry
Regards
Adam"
Hi all.
On the same vain as the above, does anybody know of any cases regarding the
technicalities of TPO boundaries.
Currently pursuing a TPO prosecution and one of the lines of defence is that
the trees in question were very close to the boundary line of the TPO area
and as the plan dates back to an OS based 1:2500 1930's plan, ambiguity
exists regarding if the trees were protected or not, by reference to the
'Area' boundary. It would therefore be beneficial to cite any past case, (TPO
prosecutions/ planning enquires etc) which hinged to some extent on the
position of the tree(s) in relation to a TPO boundary.
The site owner is suggesting that the TPO plan cannot be relied upon to an
accuracy of 2m because of its age, scale and the dotted boundary line. What
is the general consensus?
Regards
Andrew Needham
Arboricultural Officer
(01562) 732 548
******************************************************************************
This E-mail and any files transmitted with it are private and intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. The
sender's permission to read the Email and attachments is only given to the
intended recipient. Please note Wyre Forest District Council monitor all
incoming e-mails.
If you are not the intended recipient, the E-mail and any files have been
transmitted to you in error and any copying, distribution or other use of the
information contained in them is strictly prohibited and you do not have the
sender's permission to read the Email and attachments
If you have received this email in error please notify the Network
Administrator via email at: postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.gov.uk Please Note. No
employee or agent is authorised to conclude any binding agreement on behalf
of Wyre Forest District Council with another party by Email.
WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted by Email. The recipient should
check this Email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. Wyre Forest
District Council accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus
transmitted by this Email.
*****************************************************************************
X-EC0D2A8E-5CB7-4969-9C36-46D859D137BE-PartID:
7038389B-CB59-41B4-894E-0C07A073C660
X-StripMime-Failure: no text/plain
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
--- StripMime Errors ---
A message with no text/plain section was received.
The entire body of the message was removed. Please
resend the email using plaintext formatting
---
--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info
*************************************************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are private and intended solely
for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Any views or
opinions
presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those
of the Royal Parks unless otherwise specifically stated.
If you received this e-mail in error please return it to the address it came
from telling them it is not for you and then delete it from any computer.
This email system is monitored to secure its effective operation and for
other lawful business purposes.
*************************************************************************************************
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure
Intranet (GSi) virus scanning service supplied exclusively by Energis in
partnership with MessageLabs.
On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus-free
--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info
