Re: Old TPO's
| Subject: | Re: Old TPO's |
|---|---|
| From: | Mark Carter |
| Date: | Dec 13 2005 17:11:46 |
Hi Matthew, Well it is late in the day! Mark.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chatfield, Matthew" <Matthew.Chatfield@xxxx.gov.uk>
To: "UK Tree Care" <uktc@xxxxxx.tree-care.info> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 4:56 PM Subject: RE: Old TPO's Ho, ho. Nice typo. Are you suggesting that dear old Mynors is a whited sepulchre? :) -----Original Message-----
From: Mark Carter [mailto:mjc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.co.uk]
Sent: 13 December 2005 16:39
To: UK Tree Care Subject: Re: Old TPO's Chris, The similar local situation I referred to happened before Mynor's
tomb
was published and resulted in the TO and me having to backtrack on the
advice given to my client (the owner of the TPO'd tree). A bitter
lesson
not easily forgotten!
Mark.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Hastie" <Chris.Hastie@xxxxxxxxxx.gov.uk>
To: "UK Tree Care" <uktc@xxxxxx.tree-care.info> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 4:04 PM Subject: RE: Old TPO's Reply interwoven with original for context. On 13 December 2005 15:53, Mark Carter wrote:
Jon,If the TPO'd tree stands in one garden and the limb that was removedoverhangs another garden in separate ownership and the neighbouringowner removed the limb, a prosecution under the TPO may not besuccessful. The common law right to cut back to the boundary isconsidered by many (including Mynors) to override the statute law ofthe TPO,
My understanding of Mynor's view is that the fact that the branch is a nuisance is what constitutes an exemption. Your statement that the view is held by many, including Mynors, is interesting because the only people with any knowledge that I have encountered holding such a view are those that have read Mynors ;)
however this has yet to be tested by the courts.
A perfect opportunity then to find out whether Mynors or Sun Timber Co. Ltd. v Leeds City Council is right! -- Chris Hastie Strategy Officer (Arboriculture) Warwick District Council http://www.warwickdc.gov.uk/trees ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- Any opinions expressed in the E-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Warwick District Council. This E-mail and any files with it are confidential and solely for the use of the intended
recipient.
If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for
delivering to the intended recipient, please be advised that you have
received this E-mail in error and that any use is strictly prohibited.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- -- The UK Tree Care mailing list To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/ -- The UK Tree Care mailing list To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/ -- The UK Tree Care mailing list To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/ -- The UK Tree Care mailing list To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
Current thread
- Old TPO's continued
- Re: Old TPO's
Dec 13 2005 15:54:04 - Re: Old TPO's
Dec 13 2005 17:39:19 - RE: Old TPO's
Dec 13 2005 16:05:46- Re: Old TPO's
Dec 13 2005 16:39:26
- Re: Old TPO's
- RE: Old TPO's
Dec 13 2005 16:08:29 - RE: Old TPO's
Dec 13 2005 16:56:32- Re: Old TPO's
Dec 13 2005 17:09:09
- Re: Old TPO's
- RE: Old TPO's
Dec 13 2005 16:56:50- Re: Old TPO's
Dec 13 2005 17:11:46
- Re: Old TPO's
- RE: Old TPO's
Dec 13 2005 19:09:08- RE: Old TPO's
Dec 14 2005 17:08:00
- RE: Old TPO's
- Re: Old TPO's