In a message dated 15/12/2005 10:48:25 GMT Standard Time, Fraxinus1@xxxx.com
writes:
I knew that bit Bill, but where did the judge get it from?
I thought you probably did but I suppose that she (Mrs Recorder Norrie) was
getting at the difference between a 'nuisance' and a 'minor irritant.'
Reading
on from there Mynors states quite explicitly that overhang is always a
nuisance but backtracks later with reference to various bon mots such as
'inherent
absurdity' and 'political and social climate of 1947.' (1947= date of TCPA)
I think it is for us to keep on pointing out inherent absurdities so that we
get it clarified sooner rather than later. Mind you as we witness the
absurdities of the high hedges ASBO then I doubt whether there's anyone
capable of
clarifiying the murky waters in which we find ourselves floundering.
We can but hope.
Bill.
--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info
The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
