Supported by the Arborcentre

UKTC Archive

Top 21 Gardening Sites
tree-care.info for tree advice

Re: protected trees on development sites

Subject: Re: protected trees on development sites
From: STEPHEN SHIELDS
Date: Jan 03 2006 16:07:49
Hi Sharon,

With reference to para 5.26 of the 'blue book' I consider that full planning 
permission would cover any tree work  that was needed to implement that 
permission including scaffolding and reasonable access for plant and 
materials.  

I think that you would struggle to get a successful prosecution for a TPO 
breach if it could be shown that there was no reasonable way that a legal and 
valid planning permission could have been carried out without the work taking 
place.

Where high value tree may be compromised by a development, I usually request 
a method statement indicating how the trees would be protected during the 
construction.  This statement should detail any additional works that may be 
required to trees on the site, for instance to allow access.  If this is not 
provided, I would assume the worst and advise accordingly

Cheers

Steve

sharon.m.hosegood1@xxxxxxxxxxxx.com 01/01/06 08:29pm >>>
Dear all
   
  To what extent do TO's allow work to be carried out to protected trees on 
development site where pruning/ removal is required to fulfill planning 
permission?  The blue book states that planning permission overides consent, 
however, how do you define the amount of work that would be exempt from the 
normal TPO/CA requirements:
  i.e: pruning exempt where it would be within the footprint of the building, 
or allow pruning to clear scaffolding?  Would you allow pruning to clear 
cranes and plant on site, or ask for normal consent to be acheived?  Assume 
that all work would be carried out to BS3998:89 and carried out to a tight 
spec etc.
   
  As an ex TO and now consultant, I am interested in the range of 
interpretations out there.
   
  Hope you all had a fab Christmas and happy new year.
   
  Sharon Buss
   
  T

Simon Pryce Arboriculture <simon@xxxxxxxxxxx.co.uk> wrote:
  Quote:

"But he also found evidence of risk management, such as tagging of trees and 
an active pruning programme to minimise the danger."

So that's all right then.

I'm lost for words but I expect plenty of others on here won't be. Looks 
like a good thread to start the new year with.

Happy 2006 everyone



Simon


-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info 

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/ 


  



-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info 

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/ 


This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email


Disclaimer Notice

This email may contain confidential/privileged information and is intended 
solely for use of the named recipient(s). If you are not the intended 
recipient you may not disclose, copy, distribute or retain any part of this 
message or attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error please 
notify the sender immediately via e-mail or contact ICT Services at 
Shrewsbury Borough Council, Telephone 01743 281076. 

Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not 
necessarily represent those of Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council.

?Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council ? An Excellent Council?

'Winner of the small City Category - Heart of England in Bloom 2005'

This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email


-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/

Current thread