In a message dated 26/05/2006 09:11:57 GMT Standard Time,
glyn-cheshirewoodlands@xxxxxxxxxx.com writes:
Seems to me to be more to do with enforceability. No point calling
something a woodland cos you think its a woodland if the legislation doesn't
allow you to enforce its management as a woodland.
Glyn
But Glyn, A TPO doesn't allow you to enforce anything, it just allows you to
prevent something. For the W TPO you are simply able to prevent anything
happening, the regen is protected while it wouldn't be if it was a group or
T1 etc.
The task is to permit work that is beneficial to the long-term preservation
of the Woodland while the owner(s) perceive some benefit as well.
I have to accept that preventing some obsessive from mowing his woodland
floor (and thus regen) is all but impossible but we've gotta start somewhere.
I
simply thought the W TPO was thus more flexible and I think, after all the
debate, that that's what I still think....
Bill.
______________________________________________________________________
ARBORICULTURAL SURVEYOR REQUIRED: Go to www.tep.uk.com for more info
We are seeking a qualified and enthusiastic individual to undertake tree
risk assessment and management duties in the north of England. Sites are
diverse with many mature and veteran trees.
______________________________________________________________________
--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info
