Re: Application to fell Beech with suspected Meripilus
Subject: | Re: Application to fell Beech with suspected Meripilus |
|
---|---|---|
From: | Andersonarb | |
Date: | Aug 08 2006 11:42:18 |
In a message dated 08/08/2006 12:12:45 GMT Standard Time, Gilbert.Addison@xxxxxxxxxx.gov.uk writes: Sounds like a job for "Air Knife" to me or better still get Neville Fay's crew to do a pulling test on it - that's exactly what the technique is designed for, then weigh up the hazard/target balance sheet. Is that reasonable? is it a TPO or just CA? why didn't the Arb get some piccies? hasn't he heard of digicams? can't he wait for a couple of months? Do you trust him? Who is he, has he got a reputation for being cussed? Why has he waited until now to apply? After all meripilused Beech don't fail that quickly and there's one up the road from me that had Mg 25 years ago but it hasn't been seen since. See also JFLs article in the AA newsletter a few months back, and Ted's response. Patience is a virtue in these matters, if it's only CA protection then are you prepared to serve a TPO only to have to grant permission for removal in a few weeks, you LA bods get scrutinised sufficiently without you walking into a hornet's nest. If it was me applying I'd definitely wait for the infection to pop up again, I mean how much of a rush can you be in? Make it plain that you will be much more cooperative if he shows a bit of flexibility. If he goes to appeal on non-determiantion you'll look perfectly reasonable if you point out no pictures and peculiarly timed appy. Your call I'm afraid, in the end. Bill. -- The UK Tree Care mailing list To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
Current thread
- Application to fell Beech with suspected Meripilus continued
- RE: Application to fell Beech with suspected Meripilus
Aug 08 2006 10:58:24- RE: Application to fell Beech with suspected Meripilus
Aug 08 2006 11:24:31 - RE: Application to fell Beech with suspected Meripilus
Aug 08 2006 11:49:32- RE: Application to fell Beech with suspected Meripilus
Aug 08 2006 13:57:45- RE: Application to fell Beech with suspected Meripilus
Aug 08 2006 16:02:26 - RE: Application to fell Beech with suspected Meripilus
Aug 09 2006 08:15:49
- RE: Application to fell Beech with suspected Meripilus
- RE: Application to fell Beech with suspected Meripilus
- RE: Application to fell Beech with suspected Meripilus
- RE: Application to fell Beech with suspected Meripilus
Aug 08 2006 11:12:19 - Re: Application to fell Beech with suspected Meripilus
Aug 08 2006 11:45:48 - Re: Application to fell Beech with suspected Meripilus
Aug 08 2006 11:42:18- RE: Application to fell Beech with suspected Meripilus
Aug 09 2006 09:05:24
- RE: Application to fell Beech with suspected Meripilus
- RE: Application to fell Beech with suspected Meripilus
Aug 08 2006 12:02:45- RE: Application to fell Beech with suspected Meripilus
Aug 08 2006 12:44:29 - RE: Application to fell Beech with suspected Meripilus
Aug 08 2006 13:46:13
- RE: Application to fell Beech with suspected Meripilus
- Re: Application to fell Beech with suspected Meripilus
Aug 09 2006 10:40:53- RE: Application to fell Beech with suspected Meripilus
Aug 09 2006 12:01:42
- RE: Application to fell Beech with suspected Meripilus
- Re: Application to fell Beech with suspected Meripilus
Aug 09 2006 16:00:32
- RE: Application to fell Beech with suspected Meripilus