In a message dated 16/08/2006 08:42:57 GMT Standard Time,
Lee.Wright@xxxxxx.gov.uk writes:
Read!!
Lee Wright
Calm down now,
if the tag-on bits have moved and the main bits haven't then a clearer
indication of inadequate construction could not be conceived. By the sound of
things removal of the trees isn't going to make a blind bit of difference so
just
ignore them. Obviously you're an Arb so you'll need to get a structural
engineer to point that out.
If the trees have been butchered, treat that as a separate issue, why did
anyone bother TPOing such things in a rear garden in the first place?
Obviously
I don't know the history but it sounds a bit thin in my perception.
But don't allow anyone to make the connection between tree and building, it
just leads to confusion all round and from the householder's point of view it
won't solve their problem. Sounds like their beef might be with the
conservatory constructors; probably a right gang of fly-by-nights who'll've
gone out
of business by now.
Oh and I believe that permitted development rights don't count as exemptions
against TPOs do they?
Bill.
--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info
The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
