Re: Non invasive cable brace
| Subject: | Re: Non invasive cable brace |
|---|---|
| From: | Andersonarb |
| Date: | Dec 20 2006 16:20:08 |
In a message dated 20/12/2006 13:56:40 GMT Standard Time, cookleylandscapes@xxxxxx.com writes: One stem leans toward a house the other a road. It is for a TPO appeal. If you think the installation is genuinely supporting the tree, then the TPO cannot require the installation, so its condition is irrelevant unless the LA are offering to fund the ongoing maintenance of the brace. (And guaranteeing the outcome of the installation?). The 1994 review of TPOs was rejected by the Govt on the grounds that enabling LAs to oblige TPOd tree owners to undertake maintenance work was just too burdensome. (Mynors) Bill. -- The UK Tree Care mailing list To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
Current thread
- Non invasive cable brace
Dec 20 2006 13:56:23- RE: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 20 2006 15:19:37- RE: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 20 2006 15:48:16
- RE: Non invasive cable brace
- Re: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 20 2006 16:20:08- Re: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 20 2006 23:42:28- Re: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 21 2006 01:25:06- Re: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 21 2006 08:03:50 - Re: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 21 2006 08:32:01 - Re: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 21 2006 11:07:03 - Re: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 21 2006 11:48:23 - Re: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 21 2006 17:01:14 - Re: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 21 2006 17:27:21
- Re: Non invasive cable brace
- Re: Non invasive cable brace
- Re: Non invasive cable brace
- RE: Non invasive cable brace