UKTC Archive

Re: Non invasive cable brace

Index

Subject:	Re: Non invasive cable brace
From:	Pete Hughes
Date:	Dec 21 2006 11:48:23



Jerry Ross wrote:

But if a brace is justified, other than in special circumstances (e.g.

where a valuable decay-prone species really needs extra support), I'd

go for steel every time.

Jerry, just wondering why you'd go for steel everytime (just curious,

not criticising!)


Regards

Pete


--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/

Current thread

Non invasive cable brace continued
- RE: Non invasive cable brace
  Addison, Gilbert, Dec 20 2006 15:19:37
  - RE: Non invasive cable brace
    arbor, Dec 20 2006 15:48:16
- Re: Non invasive cable brace
  Andersonarb, Dec 20 2006 16:20:08
  - Re: Non invasive cable brace
    Jonathan Mills, Dec 20 2006 23:42:28
    - Re: Non invasive cable brace
      Scott Cullen, Dec 21 2006 01:25:06
      - Re: Non invasive cable brace
        Jerry Ross, Dec 21 2006 08:03:50
      - Re: Non invasive cable brace
        Paul Hawksford, Dec 21 2006 08:32:01
      - Re: Non invasive cable brace
        Scott Cullen, Dec 21 2006 11:07:03
      - Re: Non invasive cable brace
        Pete Hughes, Dec 21 2006 11:48:23
      - Re: Non invasive cable brace
        Jerry Ross, Dec 21 2006 17:01:14
      - Re: Non invasive cable brace
        Pete Hughes, Dec 21 2006 17:27:21
      - Re: Non invasive cable brace
        Scott Cullen, Dec 21 2006 17:42:25
      - Re: Non invasive cable brace
        Jerry Ross, Dec 22 2006 09:21:38
      - Re: Non invasive cable brace
        Scott Cullen, Dec 22 2006 12:01:25
      - Re: Non invasive cable brace
        Jonathan Mills, Dec 28 2006 00:22:25
      - Re: Non invasive cable brace
        Scott Cullen, Dec 28 2006 10:40:38
      - Re: Non invasive cable brace
        Jonathan Mills, Dec 28 2006 23:02:14

Index