Re: Non invasive cable brace
| Subject: | Re: Non invasive cable brace |
|---|---|
| From: | Jerry Ross |
| Date: | Dec 21 2006 17:01:14 |
Pete Hughes wrote:
Jerry Ross wrote:But if a brace is justified, other than in special circumstances(e.g. where a valuable decay-prone species really needs extrasupport), I'd go for steel every time.Jerry, just wondering why you'd go for steel everytime (just curious,not criticising!)Regards Pete
In those cases where bracing really is the solution, steel's stronger,
more reliable and not so prone to degradation ; and as a result it isn't
so dependant upon rechecking, maintenance, replacement etc. (as has been
said, over the lifetime of a tree, how many cobra braces get checked at
the appropriate intervals (and I notice no-one's actually answered Jon's
original query about what IS appropriate...)
And almost the most important - they're so very much less obtrusive. A
Cobra may be a talking point, but that because it shouts "Here I am",
whereas you often have to search for a steel cable.
Cobra's quicker to fit, of course, but any cost benefit to the customer
is likely to be offset by the need for ongoing care and frequent
adjustment/replacement.
And the benefits of it being non-invasive is, I suspect, hugely
over-stated in most cases. How many of us have NOT hit some metal object
that had become ingrown to a tree, with no sign of ill effect to
anything except the saw?
On the other hand, the point I was trying to make about decay-prone
species was not that one should anticipate decay by bracing, but that
drilling holes will CAUSE (or rather permit) decay. In those cases I'd
certainly agree that non-invasive is better. I remember taking down a
Walnut with three cables fitted and at each bolt insertion there was
bark death and decay, with one branch having broken at that point...
(And as far as I recall, that was a case where the tree's original
structure wasn't such that the braces were needed in the first place.
The cabling had actually caused its demise!)
Right. Christmas beckons (family round tomorrow) so I'm off. Have a good'n one and all! Jerry R -- -- The UK Tree Care mailing list To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
Current thread
- Non invasive cable brace continued
- RE: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 20 2006 15:48:16
- RE: Non invasive cable brace
- Re: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 20 2006 16:20:08- Re: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 20 2006 23:42:28- Re: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 21 2006 01:25:06- Re: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 21 2006 08:03:50 - Re: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 21 2006 08:32:01 - Re: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 21 2006 11:07:03 - Re: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 21 2006 11:48:23 - Re: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 21 2006 17:01:14 - Re: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 21 2006 17:27:21 - Re: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 21 2006 17:42:25 - Re: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 22 2006 09:21:38 - Re: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 22 2006 12:01:25 - Re: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 28 2006 00:22:25 - Re: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 28 2006 10:40:38 - Re: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 28 2006 23:02:14
- Re: Non invasive cable brace
- Re: Non invasive cable brace
Dec 21 2006 08:27:57
- Re: Non invasive cable brace
- Re: Non invasive cable brace