Re: Non invasive cable brace[Scanned]
| Subject: | Re: Non invasive cable brace[Scanned] |
|---|---|
| From: | Scott Cullen |
| Date: | Dec 21 2006 22:57:19 |
And decay prone or not, comapre the woind from large branch removal to the wound from an eyebolt. ----- Original Message ----- From: Robert Knott To: UK Tree Care Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 3:40 PM Subject: Re: Non invasive cable brace[Scanned] We, mostly, seem quite happy to recommend varying degrees of branch removal as a sound approach to tree maintenance in many circumstances & I'm often surprised at how keen we are to avoid crown support as being another sound approach. -- The UK Tree Care mailing list To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
Current thread
- RE: Non invasive cable brace[Scanned]
Dec 21 2006 12:58:10- RE: Non invasive cable brace[Scanned]
Dec 21 2006 13:41:43- Re: Non invasive cable brace[Scanned]
Dec 21 2006 14:30:10
- Re: Non invasive cable brace[Scanned]
- RE: Non invasive cable brace[Scanned]
Dec 21 2006 15:57:41- Re: Non invasive cable brace[Scanned]
Dec 21 2006 16:50:38
- Re: Non invasive cable brace[Scanned]
- Re: Non invasive cable brace[Scanned]
Dec 21 2006 18:10:52- Re: Non invasive cable brace[Scanned]
Dec 21 2006 20:41:11- Re: Non invasive cable brace[Scanned]
Dec 21 2006 22:57:19- The elusive Mr Cullen
Dec 22 2006 11:28:51
- The elusive Mr Cullen
- RE: Non invasive cable brace[Scanned]
Dec 22 2006 10:44:58
- Re: Non invasive cable brace[Scanned]
- Re: Non invasive cable brace[Scanned]
- RE: Non invasive cable brace[Scanned]
Dec 22 2006 12:59:15 - RE: Non invasive cable brace[Scanned]
Dec 22 2006 13:03:45
- RE: Non invasive cable brace[Scanned]