Reply interwoven with original for context.
On 25 April 2007 09:18, Andersonarb@xxxx.com wrote:
I can also see plenty of well managed LA owned woodlands suddenly
need to be TPO'd when that would simply be to create administrative
hurdles for no
benefit to anyone. I assume that Julian's client (the
Trossachs National Park)
has specific reasons for requiring this system;
Interesting point about the original client. The last time I checked the
Trossachs and Loch Lomond were in Scotland, which has a somewhat
different planning system to the one we use round our way. The 'Blue
Book' those of us south of the border have come to know and lo(v|ath)e
specifically applies to England.
--
Chris Hastie
Strategy Officer (Arboriculture)
Warwick District Council
Looking for a tree surgeon? Visit
http://www.warwickdc.gov.uk/cya
----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.warwickdc.gov.uk
Any opinions expressed in the E-mail are those of the individual and not
necessarily those of Warwick District Council. This E-mail and any files with
it are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you
are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to
the intended recipient, please be advised that you have received this E-mail
in error and that any use is strictly prohibited.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info
The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
