RE: The Poll case
| Subject: | RE: The Poll case |
|
|---|---|---|
| From: | David Evans | |
| Date: | Sep 07 2007 08:22:50 |
<<QTRA has some very beneficial aspects so does Matheny & Clarke, I am not very familiar with it M&C version.>> Hi John In light of the Poll case, it's been interesting talking to Nelda Matheny about it the M&C system. It has some very specific limitations that are often not applied, and unfortunately, most people who use M&C system misuse it. For example, I wonder how many out there are aware that it should not be used on an individual tree, that its purpose its to rank (not rate) risk, the rankings are not to be used to define levels of risk, and that a score of 5 can be a greater risk than a score of 10. Cheers Acer ventura -- The UK Tree Care mailing list To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
Current thread
- The Poll case continued
- *** SPAM ***Re: The Poll case
Sep 04 2007 16:43:10- RE: *** SPAM ***Re: The Poll case
Sep 04 2007 18:26:52- Re: The Poll case
Sep 05 2007 11:45:01 - RE: The Poll case
Sep 05 2007 13:21:02 - RE: The Poll case
Sep 06 2007 06:03:23 - Re: The Poll case
Sep 06 2007 07:54:17 - RE: The Poll case
Sep 06 2007 08:14:45 - Re: The Poll case
Sep 06 2007 16:55:52 - RE: The Poll case
Sep 07 2007 08:22:50 - RE: The Poll case - M&C
Sep 08 2007 16:02:09 - RE: The Poll case
Sep 06 2007 19:16:21 - Re: The Poll case
Sep 06 2007 20:54:33 - RE: The Poll case
Sep 06 2007 07:58:45
- Re: The Poll case
- RE: *** SPAM ***Re: The Poll case
- *** SPAM ***Re: The Poll case
- Re: The Poll case
Sep 04 2007 22:01:47- Re: The Poll case
Sep 05 2007 15:59:25- RE: The Poll case
Sep 06 2007 14:52:42- Veteran Yew
Sep 18 2007 17:27:42
- Veteran Yew
- RE: The Poll case
- Re: The Poll case