Re: Adventitious and dormant buds
| Subject: | Re: Adventitious and dormant buds |
|---|---|
| From: | Andersonarb |
| Date: | Dec 24 2007 08:17:48 |
In a message dated 21/12/2007 10:13:36 GMT Standard Time, Ron.Howe@xxxxxxxxxxx.gov.uk writes: This is why thinning is usually better than topping. Notwithstanding thinning being a "reduction in the tree's photosynthetic capacity without a corresponding reduction in its woody mass" of course. Bill. -- The UK Tree Care mailing list To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
Current thread
- Adventitious and dormant buds
Dec 21 2007 09:51:07- RE: Adventitious and dormant buds
Dec 21 2007 10:05:36 - RE: Adventitious and dormant buds
Dec 21 2007 10:06:29 - RE: Adventitious and dormant buds
Dec 21 2007 10:13:13 - RE: Adventitious and dormant buds
Dec 21 2007 23:13:47 - Re: Adventitious and dormant buds
Dec 24 2007 08:17:48 - Re: Adventitious and dormant buds
Dec 24 2007 08:39:28 - RE: Adventitious and dormant buds
Dec 24 2007 10:54:39- Re: Adventitious and dormant buds
Dec 24 2007 11:44:14 - Re: Adventitious and dormant buds
Dec 27 2007 09:41:47
- Re: Adventitious and dormant buds
- RE: Adventitious and dormant buds