Supported by the Arborcentre

UKTC Archive

tree-care.info for tree advice

Re: Legal Definition

Subject: Re: Legal Definition
From: Scott Cullen
Date: Dec 24 2007 10:03:18
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Keith Kennaugh 
  To: UK Tree Care 
  Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2007 8:36 PM
  Subject: Re: Legal Definition


  You might want to look at the Perpetuities and Accumulations act 1964.
  
http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/legResults.aspx?LegType=All%20Primary&PageNumber=1&Year=1964&NavFrom=2&activeTextDocId=1169179
  For most things it places a maximum limit of 80 years.


  SC replies:  My limited understanding of this use of "perpetuities" is that 
it relates to interests in property and rents and debts which would be 
related to typical human lives.  Perpetuities are distinguished from 
annuities.

  When single individual A owns property, ulitimately by some grant from the 
sovereign, and A dies, the interest in that property goes to A's statutory 
heirs (typically a spouse or maybe offspring) or to whomever is specified in 
a will.  If A dies without a will (intestate), A's property may revert to the 
sovereign (or be subject to some probate or other court prodceeding).  In any 
case, A's interest terminates on A's death.

  Corporations, by contrast to individuals, have perpetual lives.  
Governments, like LAs, may also have perpetual lives, but that's my 
interpretation.

  It is not at all clear to me that land use regulations like planning 
permissions or TPOs have a limited life unless that is specified in the 
creating instrument.  I think they may well be perpetual.  When A dies, 
surviving spouse or any other inheritor is eqally bound by the regulation.  
If A, while living, transfers the property interest to Z, the regulation 
remains in place (runs with the land) and binds Z.

  Now, when we get to "public goods" like trees or urban forests (or roads, 
dames, powerplants or other infrastructure), which have long live lives that 
span generations i) the intent of perpetual regulations or funding 
arrangements is very sensible and ii) there is a whole body of literature 
suggesting that our decisons may be very different.  Colin Price has written 
quite clearly in the failure (or at least flaws) of conventional cost-benefit 
analysis and discounting over long terms.  The concept of intergenerational 
equity is introduced here.  Jon H. is putting the finishing touches on a 
discounting paper, BTW :)

-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/

Current thread