Supported by the Arborcentre

UKTC Archive

tree-care.info for tree advice

Re: AA Journal Articles

Subject: Re: AA Journal Articles
From: Scott Cullen
Date: Jan 07 2008 15:57:41
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Chris Hastie 
  To: UK Tree Care 
  Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 9:45 AM
  Subject: RE: AA Journal Articles


  You're not suggesting that even the bit at the top of the first page of
  each journal that says "(c) AB Academic Publishers" is so copyright that
  it can't be reproduced here are you?

  Actually, I'm not sure that it is uncommon for organisations to use
  specialist publishers, and in doing so assign the copyright to them. The
  ISA is an interesting exception: until relatively recently the JoA was
  not copyrighted at all. 

  -- 
  Chris Hastie

To back up what Chris notes, it is very common for professional societies to 
have a journal that is in fact published by a company in the buisenss of 
doing it.  The publisher typically hold copyright for everything that author 
ever has to say about the subject for ever and ever in any forum, venue or 
publication.  That's a bit sarcastic...  But the typical author's agreement 
foisted on gullible authors says you forever after have to ask for permission 
to copy or use your own paper.

Understand this is a huge and profitable business with giants like Elsevier, 
Blackwell, Kluwer and others dominating the field.

There is something of a backlash among some authors.  Some sort of consortium 
set up that provides an "author firendly" agreement that assigns the 
publisher the exclusive right to first publish the paper in a collection of 
other papers that constitute an issue of a journal and non-exclusive rights 
to re-publish or re-print that collection, including in other languages. The 
author retains all other rights, including copying and distyributing the 
paper after that first publication, including it in a book or other 
collection and so forth.

Notwithstanding the whining of the publishers... this consortium pretty well 
documents that the publishers' costs and profit are covered by that first 
publishing and thus the rest is gravey.

The problem is that academics are desperate to get published to get tenure 
and to get grants so they are conditioned to surrender their rights.

What I find very amusing is that now that we have the internet a virtually 
all papers are digitally submitted the publishers charge more to download a 
single copy of a single paper than they ever did for hard copies of the same 
papers.

ISA is indeed anomolous in self publishing.  The ISA (C) is new.  ISA 
actually has compositiion and printing done externally on contract now.

If I recall the name of that authors' consortium I'll follow up with it.

SC


-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/

Current thread