treeblog Supported by the Arborcentre

UKTC Archive

Top 21 Gardening Sites
tree-care.info for tree advice

RE: 1App - Going live in April

Subject: RE: 1App - Going live in April
From: Jim - Quaife Woodlands
Date: Jan 23 2008 08:39:34
A standardised form is logical but the single most important criterion is
for an application to be unambiguous.  If there are only two trees in the
front garden and you only want consent to fell the eucalyptus and leave the
acacia alone, I can't see that an accurately scaled plan would assist the
application process if the applicant were unable to provide one easily.  A
simple sketch would suffice.
Where an application is made professionally and there are a great many trees
then an accurate plan is very useful.
However, the question is begged: if the TPO plan in the First Schedule is
accurate enough for legal purposes, then to what extent does the position of
a tree have to be accurate (aside from construction ambitions that is) for
an application? 
If the application perfectly clear I would hope that TOs are reasonable.
Anyway, looks like I'm going to have to go to work!
Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Andersonarb@xxxx.com [mailto:Andersonarb@xxxx.com] 
Sent: 22 January 2008 19:04
To: UK Tree Care
Subject: Re: 1App - Going live in April

 
In a message dated 22/01/2008 16:58:42 GMT Standard Time,  
AClout@xxxxxxxxx.gov.uk writes:

Sorry  about the vexed nature of the post, 


From a quick scout round the Planning Portal Andy it seems reasonable to
me, 
and just to test it I've submitted an application to prune the Mulberry in  
my back garden. It did invite me to spend 40 quid with the OS for a site
plan 
so  naturally I skipped that step and after some clicking and ummin and
ahing 
and  stepping backwards once or twice it seemed to work. I've not submitted
any 
sort  of plan ofr photo so I guess that will be the subject of further 
correspondence  from th LA
 
There is no TPO on my Mulberry so it will be interesting to see what the  
Planning Portal makes of that, spose I'd better ring the office tomorrow and

tell em not to take it too seriously....
 
Pondering on, I can't see that most Joe and Joannas won't just  print out
the 
forms and submit them by post, and I can't see that the form is  now a 
compulsory one, so I don't s'pose it will be until the Blue Book is
reviewed.
 
However, I don't dislike the new form and I can't see that it so far makes  
any more demands on Joe and Joanna so in all no real objection. Admittedly I

dunno what it's like from your side.
 
So far I'm not gonna get vexed about it.
 
Bill.



   


-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
Email the way you want it - scanned for viruses and spam by emailsystems

If you believe this email is spam, please forward to spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.com




-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/


Current thread