RE: "APPROVED CONTRACTORS"
| Subject: | RE: "APPROVED CONTRACTORS" |
|---|---|
| From: | rupertbaker |
| Date: | Apr 21 2008 13:50:54 |
Dear Chris - looks like it ticks all the boxes - nice and clear and explanatory (but would it be worth a brief explainer of what the different NVQetc levels are?) As with all technical qualifications, the holder needs regular experience to complement the underpinning knowledge etc and ensure efficient, good quality work Rupert -----Original Message----- From: Chris Hastie [mailto:Chris.Hastie@xxxxxxxxxx.gov.uk] Sent: 21 April 2008 11:12 To: UK Tree Care Subject: RE: "APPROVED CONTRACTORS" To Peter's original question, I've tried to put some information on how to interpret claims made in tree surgeon's ads at http://www.tree-care.info/findanarb/qualifications I'd be happy to hear any feedback or comments on this page. -- Chris Hastie -- The UK Tree Care mailing list To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
Current thread
- "APPROVED CONTRACTORS" continued
- Re: "APPROVED CONTRACTORS"
Apr 20 2008 09:12:56- RE: "APPROVED CONTRACTORS"
Apr 20 2008 19:37:15- RE: "APPROVED CONTRACTORS"
Apr 21 2008 07:59:23- RE: "APPROVED CONTRACTORS"
Apr 21 2008 08:17:38 - RE: "APPROVED CONTRACTORS"
Apr 21 2008 09:52:15 - RE: "APPROVED CONTRACTORS" [Scanned]
Apr 21 2008 10:06:03 - RE: "APPROVED CONTRACTORS"
Apr 21 2008 17:38:31
- RE: "APPROVED CONTRACTORS"
- RE: "APPROVED CONTRACTORS"
- RE: "APPROVED CONTRACTORS"
- RE: "APPROVED CONTRACTORS"
Apr 21 2008 10:12:55- RE: "APPROVED CONTRACTORS"
Apr 21 2008 13:50:54 - RE: "APPROVED CONTRACTORS"
Apr 21 2008 14:02:20 - RE: "APPROVED CONTRACTORS"
Apr 21 2008 15:27:37 - RE: "APPROVED CONTRACTORS"
Apr 21 2008 19:48:40
- RE: "APPROVED CONTRACTORS"
- RE: "APPROVED CONTRACTORS"
Apr 21 2008 10:44:18 - RE: "APPROVED CONTRACTORS"
Apr 21 2008 15:16:04
- Re: "APPROVED CONTRACTORS"