Re: Reduction Via Thinning (RVT) [Scanned]
| Subject: | Re: Reduction Via Thinning (RVT) [Scanned] |
|
|---|---|---|
| From: | Keith Kennaugh | |
| Date: | Apr 26 2008 23:34:37 |
2008/4/26 Simon Keenan <simon_keenan@xxxxxxxxxxx.co.uk>:
So I suppose you wouldn't support RVT then? I just don't see the need for coming up with namby pamby terms for cutting
off branches. AFAICT it is just a term to baffle the punters with to try to make yourself sound clever. -- The UK Tree Care mailing list To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
Current thread
- Re: Reduction Via Thinning (RVT) [Scanned] continued
- Re: Reduction Via Thinning (RVT) [Scanned]
Apr 24 2008 18:38:12 - RE: Reduction Via Thinning (RVT) [Scanned]
Apr 24 2008 19:38:45 - Re: Reduction Via Thinning (RVT) [Scanned]
Apr 24 2008 19:59:38 - RE: Reduction Via Thinning (RVT) [Scanned]
Apr 24 2008 21:14:51 - Re: Reduction Via Thinning (RVT) [Scanned]
Apr 24 2008 21:47:55 - Re: Reduction Via Thinning (RVT) [Scanned]
Apr 24 2008 23:11:30 - Re: Reduction Via Thinning (RVT) [Scanned]
Apr 26 2008 01:25:09 - RE: Reduction Via Thinning (RVT) [Scanned]
Apr 26 2008 14:20:37 - Re: Reduction Via Thinning (RVT) [Scanned]
Apr 26 2008 23:34:37 - Re: Reduction Via Thinning (RVT) [Scanned]
Apr 27 2008 00:01:09 - Re: Reduction Via Thinning (RVT) [Scanned]
Apr 30 2008 23:44:37 - RE: Reduction Via Thinning (RVT)
May 01 2008 08:40:42 - RE: Reduction Via Thinning (RVT)
May 01 2008 08:55:53 - RE: Reduction Via Thinning (RVT)
May 01 2008 12:57:25 - Re: Reduction Via Thinning (RVT) ©
May 01 2008 17:44:43 - Re: Reduction Via Thinning (RVT) © [Scanned]
May 02 2008 07:03:12 - RE: Reduction Via Thinning (RVT) C
May 02 2008 09:02:40
- Re: Reduction Via Thinning (RVT) [Scanned]