Re: 1App and tree work applications
| Subject: | Re: 1App and tree work applications |
|---|---|
| From: | Tim Scott-Ellis |
| Date: | May 08 2008 20:20:06 |
Chris Hastie wrote:
Reply interwoven with original for context. On 08 May 2008 13:16, Simon Keenan wrote:In the meantime there is no actual requirement for TPO/CA applications to be made via the 1APP form and so it is perfectly legitimate for LAs to use old/existingforms, whew...Which I've pointed out to planning. They in turn have pointed out that we can't stop people using the Planning Portal though. The only solution to that is to somehow persuade the Planning Portal to update their dreadful form. The sensible approach, it would seem to me, would be for them to withdraw it until the consultation results are out and it can be reissued in line with those results. Of course, I may be being niave in expecting that a consultation exercise will lead to an improvement. The five yearly consultation on who should be the government never seems to.
Working at this from the other end and submitting tree work apps through
the planning portal has recently become ridiculously cimbersome and
unreliable.
I have gone back to submitting them on the old paper forms.
Tim -- The UK Tree Care mailing list To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
Current thread
- 1App and tree work applications
May 08 2008 10:06:49- RE: 1App and tree work applications
May 08 2008 10:14:14 - Re: 1App and tree work applications [Scanned]
May 08 2008 10:21:06 - RE: 1App and tree work applications
May 08 2008 10:27:11 - RE: 1App and tree work applications
May 08 2008 12:16:53 - RE: 1App and tree work applications
May 08 2008 12:32:37- Re: 1App and tree work applications
May 08 2008 20:20:06
- Re: 1App and tree work applications
- RE: 1App and tree work applications
May 09 2008 07:14:23 - RE: 1App and tree work applications
May 09 2008 08:16:20
- RE: 1App and tree work applications