Get ranked on Top Tree Sites Supported by the Arborcentre

UKTC Archive

Top 21 Gardening Sites
tree-care.info for tree advice

RE: trees and buildings

Subject: RE: trees and buildings
From: Nick Jones
Date: Jul 07 2008 15:05:46
Bill 

The précis is pretty much what I have already said. The article actually
relates to subsidence and a tale of unmaintained street trees and highways
etc. 

I am of course in complete agreement with your points, however whilst 5837
is a more than adequate platform for assessing trees and in some cases
justifying removal it does require someone with a modicum of knowledge to
complete it. I would suggest that is why people try and make 4.2 it fit for
other purposes. Ignorance is bliss eh?

Nick 

-----Original Message-----
From: Andersonarb@xxxx.com [mailto:Andersonarb@xxxx.com] 
Sent: 07 July 2008 14:42
To: UK Tree Care
Subject: Re: trees and buildings

 
In a message dated 07/07/2008 11:40:47 GMT Standard Time,  
nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.co.uk writes:

This  article makes mention of
the NHBC standard being used to assess the impact  of and in some cases to
justify removal of existing trees to facilitate new  build. 

The mind boggles!





Nick I don't think you should scan and post copyrighted material, however  
you could give us a precis. If it's an artichoke writing there's already a  
degree of scepticism here. 
 
That aside, why would you use NHBC 4.2 to justify tree removal? From memory

if you've got a now absent tree on a site, you should still be building as
if 
the tree was there with the same heave precautions. If you think that
felling 
 a tree will do you any good when we've no real idea how long the soil will 
take  to get back to where it was before the tree started growing; well, I
just 
don't  see how that works..... And what's to stop another tree growing?
Apart 
from the  patio of course.
 
If you need justification for felling a tree BS5837 will do quite nicely,
as 
will "it's my tree and I'll do what I like with it, unless you can show  
there's good reason for it to be otherwise."
 
Mind boggling? no change there; mines permanently in that state.  SNAFU.
 
Bill.
 
 



   


-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/


-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/

Current thread