RE: Risk and Regulation Advisory Council & BS 8516
| Subject: | RE: Risk and Regulation Advisory Council & BS 8516 |
|
|---|---|---|
| From: | David Evans | |
| Date: | Jul 15 2008 12:10:28 |
<<Seriously, drive by's are fine if they are not a substitute for a good look and someone made the point that its a good way of identifying targets but not many drive bys will involve looking at both sides of the tree, now will they?>> Hi David No they won't, but that isn't the issue. I've got a bit lost with the point that you're trying to make about tree inspections and tree risk in this thread and wondered whether we could start with the fundamentals of what you're saying. So here's a few questions. Should an arboriculturist be looking at both sides and inspecting all trees in the country? I presume your answer is no. Okay, if not, which trees and how many trees (say to the nearest million or so) do you reckon we should be looking at both sides of? How often should we be doing this? What do you estimate the annual cost is of all these double sided inspections? Do you think this cost is proportional or reasonable, in relation to the level of risk posed by trees? Cheers Acer ventura -- The UK Tree Care mailing list To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
Current thread
- Risk and Regulation Advisory Council & BS 8516 continued
- RE: Risk and Regulation Advisory Council & BS 8516
Jul 11 2008 07:58:40 - RE: Risk and Regulation Advisory Council & BS 8516
Jul 11 2008 11:38:04- RE: Risk and Regulation Advisory Council & BS 8516
Jul 11 2008 13:39:13
- RE: Risk and Regulation Advisory Council & BS 8516
- Re: Risk and Regulation Advisory Council & BS 8516
Jul 12 2008 11:27:43- RE: Risk and Regulation Advisory Council & BS 8516
Jul 13 2008 17:41:01
- RE: Risk and Regulation Advisory Council & BS 8516
- RE: Risk and Regulation Advisory Council & BS 8516
Jul 14 2008 07:42:04 - RE: Risk and Regulation Advisory Council & BS 8516
Jul 14 2008 13:38:26 - RE: Risk and Regulation Advisory Council & BS 8516
Jul 15 2008 09:36:35- RE: Risk and Regulation Advisory Council & BS 8516
Jul 15 2008 12:10:28- RE: Risk and Regulation Advisory Council & BS 8516
Jul 16 2008 07:20:31- RE: Risk and Regulation Advisory Council & BS 8516
Jul 16 2008 10:19:52 - RE: Risk and Regulation Advisory Council & BS 8516
Jul 16 2008 11:20:00 - RE: Risk and Regulation Advisory Council & BS 8516
Jul 16 2008 11:51:20 - RE: Risk and Regulation Advisory Council & BS 8516
Jul 16 2008 15:46:46 - RE: Risk and Regulation Advisory Council & BS 8516
Jul 16 2008 19:14:51
- RE: Risk and Regulation Advisory Council & BS 8516
- RE: Risk and Regulation Advisory Council & BS 8516
- RE: Risk and Regulation Advisory Council & BS 8516
- RE: Risk and Regulation Advisory Council & BS 8516
Jul 15 2008 09:45:30 - RE: Risk and Regulation Advisory Council & BS 8516
Jul 15 2008 09:50:57
- RE: Risk and Regulation Advisory Council & BS 8516