Get ranked on Top Tree Sites Supported by the Arborcentre

UKTC Archive

Top 21 Gardening Sites
tree-care.info for tree advice

Re: Tree numbering

Subject: Re: Tree numbering
From: Andersonarb
Date: Aug 29 2008 11:11:22
______________________________________________________________________
                             CAVAT IN PRACTICE
          A days training seminar with the author, Chris Neilan.

        Informative CAVAT training seminar on 25th September 2008. 

                     http://www.tma-consultants.co.uk
______________________________________________________________________

 
In a message dated 29/08/2008 11:49:24 GMT Standard Time,  
nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.co.uk writes:

Much of  the survey work I am
undertaking involves large numbers of trees and to try  and identify them
from a drawing minus the aid of GPS would be  impossibility. With a numbered
tag the margin for error is greatly reduced.  GPS is all well and good for
the surveyor however if the end user (client)  doesn't have the same
capabilities the technology is wasted.  



I have to say I'm surprised by how many people do seem to be using GPS/GIS.  
I also have to say that the sort of sites I seem to deal with most frequently 
 
just don't have so many trees that a drawing won't cover them. Leastways if  
there are a lot of trees in a group or woodland then they get treated as er a 
 
group, as BS5837 says we should....
 
I'm not sure what Nick is doing although I know he's reviewing TPOs, I'd  
remind him that IMO trying to individually plot a load of trees in a woodland 
 
for a TPO would be far better treated as a woodland, a more versatile and  
powerful tool. Especially if you can't clearly identify which tree is which 
in a  
woodland...
 
Interesting though, probably better pay more attention to the  kit-purveyors.
 
Bill.



   


-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info


Current thread