Supported by the Arborcentre

UKTC Archive

Top 21 Gardening Sites
tree-care.info for tree advice

Interpretation

Subject: Interpretation
From: Jonathan Astill
Date: Sep 04 2008 15:47:02
______________________________________________________________________
§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
                    ‹‹‹‹‹‹‹   Don’t forget!   ›››››››
         Andy Poynters’ survey on hard surfaces near to trees
   http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=sVv9yNRZMgYvBpdQalL3Ng_3d_3d
   
                        Go on, fill it in now!!    
§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
______________________________________________________________________

Hi all
 
I would be interested in hearing how the other TOs out there will be
dealing with this new requirement under the amended regs:   
 
(iv) appropriate evidence describing any structural damage to property
or in relation to tree health or safety, as applicable.
 
I am comfortable with structural damage part yet I have concern with the
required evidence for tree health or safety. If the TO is determining
the application, then they should have the knowledge, qualifications and
experience to do so (in almost all cases) in the absence of an
independant report. Agreed, a independent and sometimes contrary view
from a fellow professional can be very useful to assist the decision
making process, but is frequently not essential and could pose an
considerable and unecessary expense to the client. 
 
      
Scenario 1

*       Application received from Mrs Miggins proposing tree is removed
because it is dangereous. No justification to support this statement. 
*       TO rejects application as desk top exercise as it does not meet
requirements. Sends application back to Mrs Miggins asking for evidence.

*       Mrs Miggins gets a consultant in to confirm that the tree has
significant defects/decay and poses an unacceptable risk. 
*       Mrs Miggins parts with large sums of money for report and
provides s.198(6) notice or submits application with report appended. 
*       TO visits to determine application or check on s.198(6) and
confirms within one nano-second of seeing the tree that it should be
pruned at ground level. 
*       Mrs Miggins gets cold over the winter because she can't afford
the gas bill.   

Scenario 2  

*       Application received from Mrs Miggins proposing tree is removed
because it is dangereous. No justification to support this statement. 
*       TO rejects application as desk top exercise as it does not meet
requirements. Sends application back to Mrs Miggins asking for evidence.

*       Mrs Miggins gets a consultant in who says it's OK. Its just a
bit big and sways a lot.  
*       Mrs Miggins parts with large sums of money and reluctantly
accepts the findings. 
*       Mrs Miggins gets cold over the winter because she can't afford
the gas bill. Whilst she's made a saving by not having the tree felled,
she was relying on the logs to stoke her wood burner.     

Scenario 3

*       Application received from Mrs Miggins proposing tree is removed
because it is dangereous. No justification to support this statement. 
*       TO accepts application because they want to Mrs Miggins to stay
warm this winter.  
*       TO visits to determine application. Its a close one, but the TO
goes down the refusal route and provides a comprehensive reason with the
decision notice.    
*       Mrs Miggins doesn't accept the findings and appeals. 
*       Appeal dismissed but she has not had the opportunity to
elaborate or counter the TOs reason for refusal.  
*       LPA get wrapped on knuckles for registering application without
appropriate evidence. 

The key words in the above requirement are 'as applicable'. But how do
you know what is applicable at the registration stage?  
 
Jonathan 
LEGAL NOTICE 

The information contained in this communication (including any attachments) 
is CONFIDENTIAL and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed and others authorised to receive it. 

If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately 
and destroy any copies of this message. 
Any disclosure, copying distribution or taking of any action in reliance on 
the content of this information is strictly prohibited. 
Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not 
necessarily represent those of East Dorset District Council. 

East Dorset District Council promotes global environmental awareness and the 
recycling of all reusable materials.  
Please do not print emails unless absolutely necessary.

East Dorset District Council,Council Offices,Furzehill,Wimborne,Dorset BH21 
4HN



-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

Current thread

  • Interpretation
    Jonathan Astill, Sep 04 2008 15:47:02