Supported by the Arborcentre

UKTC Archive

Top 21 Gardening Sites
tree-care.info for tree advice

RE: Highway tree responsibility

Subject: RE: Highway tree responsibility
From: Howe, Ron
Date: Sep 05 2008 14:33:17
______________________________________________________________________
         Have you helped out on 'Ask an Arborist' lately?

                  http://www.tree-care.info/ask
______________________________________________________________________

Ben,

I'm sure some Highway Officers will clarify the position, but IMHO the
tree is not a hazard in any form as long as it's in a healthy, sound and
stable condition and therefore, if someone hits it, it should be down to
their own stupidity. What about the thread some short time back where
there were trees retained in the highway. The HA would be strongly
advised to make an application unless it could be clearly demonstrated
the trees were exempt or a statutory nuisance. What about low bridges.
Do they modify them? What about street furniture ... Road signs, traffic
lights. How many of them are level with the curb and get struck by
vehicles.

Ron Howe
Tree Officer
Environment Department
Mole Valley District Council
Pippbrook
Dorking
RH4 1SJ
Direct Tel. 01306 879 286


-----Original Message-----
From: ben riches [mailto:treecraft@xxxxxxxx.co.uk] 
Sent: Fri, 05 September 2008 15:21
To: UK Tree Care
Subject: Highway tree responsibility

______________________________________________________________________
         Have you helped out on 'Ask an Arborist' lately?

                  http://www.tree-care.info/ask
______________________________________________________________________


A group of mature trees form a 'tunnel' over a well used country 'B'
road. This group is protected by a Group TPO.
A mature beech in this group has a large limb over the highway which
gives a clearance of 4.8m at the edge of the carriageway, less than the
5.2m requested by the highways department. The limb is so significant
that the loss of it will mean the whole tree will have to be remove due
to its 'unique' (wind battered) form.
 
The Highways Dept. have also requested 0.6m clearance in from the edge
of the carriageway be maintained. This would result in the loss of
approximately 4 more mature trees and a significant feature in this
small part of the world.
 
If a high-sided vehicle collided with this limb or any of the trees, who
would be responsible? The driver for driving without due care and
attention, the Highways Dept. for not maintaining a clear carriageway,
or the tree owner for allowing the tree to pose a hazard?
 
I guess as Highway Regs over-rule TPO protection that there is not a lot
can be done to protect these trees, or is there?
 
Regards
 
Ben
 
_________________________________________________________________
Win New York holidays with Kellogg's & Live Search
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/111354033/direct/01/


--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

______________________________________________________________________

Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. Save paper.

Visit http://www.molevalley.gov.uk for information about Council services, 
online payments and planning information.

This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use 
of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you are not the 
intended recipient, the E-mail and any files have been transmitted to you in 
error and any copying, distribution or other use of the information contained 
in them is strictly prohibited.

The Council computer systems may be monitored and communications carried on 
them recorded, to secure the effective operation of the system and for other 
lawful purposes.




-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

Current thread