Supported by the Arborcentre

UKTC Archive

Top 21 Gardening Sites
tree-care.info for tree advice

Re: New Trees Regulations

Subject: Re: New Trees Regulations
From: Andersonarb
Date: Sep 05 2008 16:47:51
______________________________________________________________________
         Have you helped out on 'Ask an Arborist' lately?

                  http://www.tree-care.info/ask
______________________________________________________________________

 
In a message dated 04/09/2008 11:57:49 GMT Standard Time,  
Peter.Annett@xxxxxxxxxxxx.gsi.gov.uk writes:

 These new Regulations introduce -

*    A new  standard, mandatory application form for work to trees 
protected by a tree  preservation order (TPO). An application made in any 
other manner 
cannot be  accepted by the local planning authority.

*    A  requirement that information to support the reasons for the 
proposed work must  be provided with the application.

*    A fast track  appeals process. The days of written representations 
will be replaced by the  Planning Inspectorate, on appeal, considering the 
representations and  information supplied with the original application. 
(This is 
similar to the  process for dealing with appeals in respect of the high 
hedges 
legislation  under the Anti-social Behaviour Act 2003.) 
 



Having pondered this lot a bit Peter I'm still unsure of how much  
information will be mandatory. Will your colleague(?) be clarifying this in  
Canterbury? 
I'm particularly concerned that making a site plan obligatory is  largely 
unnecessary (The only tree in the front garden hardly requires a site  plan) 
and 
really the LPA ought to be able to see which tree we're talking  about from 
their nicely drawn TPO plan, a copy of which ought to be freely  available, 
no?
 
We need to keep sight of the principle that a TPO is an imposition on a  
property owner and if we're not to discourage people from owning trees or 
drive  
the (domestic) business into the hands of the itinerant (standard-free) tree  
worker then a supportive touch is required.
 
IME too many small LAs without any Arb on hand simply hide behind  procedural 
dogma and giving them any more license to do this will be a backward  step. 
We should not forget that the recommendations of the Batho review were  
discarded as being "too burdensome on all concerned."
 
Bill.
 



   



-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

Current thread