UKTC Archive

RE: occupiers liability [Scanned]

Subject: RE: occupiers liability [Scanned]
From: Edmund Hopkins
Date: Nov 24 2008 10:29:06
This seems to me overly defensive Ron, and a bit depressing really. For 
another approach read the review of this area published by Crown Office 
Chambers  (Cooper and Antrobus) 2005 entitled "The Right to Take Risk" and 
linked in a previous uktc thread, also the Tomlinson v Congleton BC case 
which brought some common sense back to matters.


Edmund Hopkins
Tree Officer
Planning Services
Nottingham City Council
From: Howe, Ron []
Sent: 24 November 2008 09:36
To: UK Tree Care
Subject: RE: occupiers liability [Scanned]


I believe the short answer is, that a trespass warning sign is not
enough. Your client, as you know, has a duty of care to ensure that
anyone who might enter their land, legally or not, does not get injured.
If they do, then they could take your client to court. The argument
would be that although they were warned not to trespass, there were no
warnings about the dangers. You must also cater for people that might
not be able to read the signs for whatever reason you can think of ...
the young and careless, old and careless, long sighted, learning
disabled, didn't enter by a sign etc. The best option might be to make
the land inaccessible. Nevertheless, your client would still be liable
if someone broke in and became injured. So a combination of preventing
access and remedial works would be a reasonable combination in
conjunction with signs warning of and at any hazardous structures.


Ron Howe
Planning Tree Officer
Mole Valley District Council
Direct Tel. 01306 XXX XXX

-----Original Message-----
From: paul hughes []
Sent: Sat, 22 November 2008 13:50
To: UK Tree Care
Subject: occupiers liability

My client has a woodland with mature trees that are in decline with
ganoderma , HF etc present.
Several people enter the wood uninvited to exercise their dogs bowels
(and legs) but there are clear warnings about trespass in place.
As the estate is an old peoples home with charitable status (including
the woodland) there is little money in the pot for the felling
'necessary'.  I would like to be able to leave those trees deeper into
the wood to a more natural decline dealing with the iffy ones by the
drive and nearby bridle way.
Is a sign about trespass and stating the condition of the trees with a
disclaimer enough to enable us to leave the deeper wood to its own
devices? Or are we still culpable if a trespasser gets squashed?


The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre


Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. Save paper.

Visit for information about Council services, 
online payments and planning information.

This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use 
of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you are not the 
intended recipient, the E-mail and any files have been transmitted to you in 
error and any copying, distribution or other use of the information contained 
in them is strictly prohibited.

The Council computer systems may be monitored and communications carried on 
them recorded, to secure the effective operation of the system and for other 
lawful purposes.

The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
Registered to vote yet? Easy as 1 2 3...    
All city households need to register to vote this year and every year - call 
us on 0115 XXXXXXX

This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content 
and cleared by NetIQ MailMarshal.

This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may 
contain personal views which are not the views of 
Nottingham City Council unless specifically stated. 
If you have received it in error, please delete it from
your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information
in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
immediately. Please note that Nottingham City Council
monitors e-mails sent or received for the purposes of
ensuring compliance with its policies and procedures.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.
The contents of e-mails sent or received may have to be
disclosed if a relevant request is made under current
legislation, such as, but not limited to, the Data Protection
Act 1998 and the Freedom of Information Act 2000

The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre