UKTC Archive

RE: Plotting groups

Subject: RE: Plotting groups
From: brendantuer@xxxxxxxx.co.uk
Date: Dec 15 2008 11:35:49
Thanks Ron and Luke,
I suppose my question is more along the lines of...
"Is there any case law out there which has dealt with the failure of a 
tree from within a group of trees, where the tree was previously 
surveyed as "one-of-a-group," as opposed to an individual?"
eg. Lets say, a mixed woodland group is plotted within a GIS database 
as such, and a large ash failed from within this group.
In this instance, both the local authority and surveyor might struggle 
to provide proof that a detailed survey had been undertaken in respect 
of that particular tree.

I ask on behalf of a local authority, who wish to survey trees as 
groups and only plot individual trees as exceptions to this rule.   I 
wonder if Mike Ellison could help?



 

----Original Message----
From: Ron.Howe@xxxxxxxxxxx.gov.uk
Date: 15/12/2008 10:17 
To: "UK Tree Care"<uktc@xxxxxx.tree-care.info>
Subj: RE: Plotting groups

If one stem were to fail from your group then ... a 'stem' from the
group has failed ... A group of X number stems is now a group of Y
number stems. They don't have to be identical, anymore than all the
branches or multiple stems on a single tree are. They probably just 
need
to be of the same species, otherwise, it becomes a copse or a stand, 
or
grove, or group of mixed species. With TPOs you should be able to 
plot
the stems of a group and quote the number of stems of each species
represented. I did a TPO of a small wooded band between an industrial
park and housing. The group included 30 Cypress, 4 Oak, Poplar, Field
Maple etc.

Ron Howe
Planning Tree Officer
Mole Valley District Council
Pippbrook
Dorking
RH4 1SJ
Direct Tel. 01306 XXX XXX


-----Original Message-----
From: brendantuer@xxxxxxxx.co.uk [mailto:brendantuer@xxxxxxxx.co.uk] 
Sent: Fri, 12 December 2008 18:32
To: UK Tree Care
Subject: RE: Plotting groups


"Why should a group of trees be treated any differently to say a
multistem tree, as long as you identify the faults and deal with 
them."

Yes. As long as you identify all the faults - but, my point is that 
its
very difficult to find a honogenous group (where all trees are
identical).
What tends to happen with databases, is a group is plotted and then a
couple of "problem trees" are identified as individuals within the
group.  But what if one of the other trees fails (one which has not 
been
recorded individually)?
 


----Original Message----
From: Ron.Howe@xxxxxxxxxxx.gov.uk
Date: 12/12/2008 11:08
To: "UK Tree Care"<uktc@xxxxxx.tree-care.info>
Subj: RE: Plotting groups

Brendan,

Why should a group of trees should be treated any differently to say
a
multistem tree, as long as you identify the faults and deal with
them. A
group of one species is a cohesive unit.


Ron Howe
Planning Tree Officer
Mole Valley District Council
Pippbrook
Dorking
RH4 1SJ
Direct Tel. 01306 XXX XXX


-----Original Message-----
From: brendantuer@xxxxxxxx.co.uk [mailto:brendantuer@xxxxxxxx.co.uk]
Sent: Fri, 12 December 2008 10:55
To: UK Tree Care
Subject: Plotting groups

Question: Tree databases.

Plotting trees in groups is more cost effective.  It provides data
which
is easy to understand and easy to re-visit, (especially when 
compared 
with lots of confusing, individual records).  But does a 
methodology 
which promotes the surveying of the majority of trees as groups,
offer a
robust defence against litigation?

Let's say, "Bob" surveys 10 trees in a collective group.  They are 
generally in fair health but with some minor defects.  They are
located
next to a public highway.  Bob surveyed them all in detail at the
time
of inspection, but the methodology requires one generalised record
for
the collective group.  We know that all trees are slightly different
and
a single database entry for a group of trees will only ever record
the
"average tree" within the group.  

Now lets say one of the trees, fails.  The expert witness for the
"other
side" says what he is paid to say, "there was clear evidence that 
the 
tree would fail."  If we assume that "Bob" surveyed the trees
properly
(and yes, with hindsight, the tree should have been plotted as an 
individual, but the same applies to most of the others), is there 
an 
obvious problem with a methodology which promotes plotting trees as 
groups wherever possible?  Will such a methodology provide a robust 
defence against litigation?

Now lets apply the same scenario to a woodland.  There are over 
1,000 
trees and again, a general note appears within the database.  One of
the
trees fails...

Any thoughts?
Brendan









Discounted hotel bookings - http://www.tiscali.co.uk/travel 
________________________________________________




--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre http://www.arborcentre.co.
uk/

______________________________________________________________________

Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. Save 
paper.

Visit http://www.molevalley.gov.uk for information about Council
services, online payments and planning information.

This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for
the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If 
you
are not the intended recipient, the E-mail and any files have been
transmitted to you in error and any copying, distribution or other 
use
of the information contained in them is strictly prohibited.

The Council computer systems may be monitored and communications
carried on them recorded, to secure the effective operation of the
system and for other lawful purposes.




--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre http://www.arborcentre.co.
uk/






Discounted hotel bookings - http://www.tiscali.co.uk/travel
________________________________________________




-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/

______________________________________________________________________

Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. Save paper.

Visit http://www.molevalley.gov.uk for information about Council 
services, online payments and planning information.

This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for 
the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you 
are not the intended recipient, the E-mail and any files have been 
transmitted to you in error and any copying, distribution or other use 
of the information contained in them is strictly prohibited.

The Council computer systems may be monitored and communications 
carried on them recorded, to secure the effective operation of the 
system and for other lawful purposes.




-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/






Discounted hotel bookings - http://www.tiscali.co.uk/travel
________________________________________________




-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/