Supported by the Arborcentre

UKTC Archive

tree-care.info for tree advice

RE: Cable Bracing TPO'd Trees [Scanned]

Subject: RE: Cable Bracing TPO'd Trees [Scanned]
From: Simon Valente
Date: Dec 16 2008 08:37:22



 "How do you refuse it if the system would not have any detrimental impact on 
the
 tree itself?"
 
 Detrimental?, hmmm. What would be the point of this work? Is there a suspect 
fork? If so, is it proposed that the cable should take on the job of 
supporting this "weak" fork???  As we know, a tree is a self optimising 
organism, so to install a cable that in any way takes on some of the trees 
loading WILL have a detrimental effect because the tree will stop doing the 
job for itself. If the tree has a weak fork, but is in your opinion fine and 
would be quite capable of dealing with any  so called "weakness" itself in 
the long term, then i suggest that this would be the best thing to do, ie.. 
let the tree get on with it.    

However, if the tree is in such poor condition that it requires bits of rope 
to hold it together then perhaps removing the TPO would be a good idea. If 
the owner still wants to play about with it after that then let him or her 
get on with it. 

That said, if the con-tractor just wants to install a very loose fitting 
cobra system that will have no effect on the trees loading at all, or in 
other words... no effect at all, and the object of the work is more to 
reassure the owner than do anything to the tree then I think its a great 
idea, what with it being christmas time and the credit crunch and all that, a 
bit of money for old rope could come in handy :-)

Simon Valente



========================================
 Message Received: Dec 15 2008, 02:13 PM
 From: "Edmund Hopkins" 
 To: "UK Tree Care" 
 Cc: 
 Subject: RE: Cable Bracing TPO'd Trees [Scanned]
 
 
 If the cable is non invasive where then is the need to apply, I presume 
that's what was meant..?
 
 Edmund
 
 Edmund Hopkins
 Tree Officer
 Planning Services
 Nottingham City Council
 ________________________________________
 From: Paul Casey [paul.casey@xxxxxxxxxx.gov.uk]
 Sent: 15 December 2008 14:09
 To: UK Tree Care
 Subject: Re: Cable Bracing TPO'd Trees [Scanned]
 
 Cheers Ron
 
 How do you refuse it if the system would not have any detrimental impact on 
the
 tree itself? I assume it's something like a tree house scenario, you can't
 prevent installation provided there is no impact on the tree?
 
 Cheers
 
 
 
 
 --
 The UK Tree Care mailing list
 To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info
 
 The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
 http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
 Registered to vote yet? Easy as 1 2 3...    
 All city households need to register to vote this year and every year - call 
us on 0115 9154938
 
 This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content 
 and cleared by NetIQ MailMarshal.
 
 This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may 
 contain personal views which are not the views of 
 Nottingham City Council unless specifically stated. 
 If you have received it in error, please delete it from
 your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information
 in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
 immediately. Please note that Nottingham City Council
 monitors e-mails sent or received for the purposes of
 ensuring compliance with its policies and procedures.
 Further communication will signify your consent to this.
 The contents of e-mails sent or received may have to be
 disclosed if a relevant request is made under current
 legislation, such as, but not limited to, the Data Protection
 Act 1998 and the Freedom of Information Act 2000
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 The UK Tree Care mailing list
 To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info
 
 The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
 http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
 
 



-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/

Current thread