Re: Statutory undertakers and TPO's
| Subject: | Re: Statutory undertakers and TPO's |
|---|---|
| From: | David Cheshire |
| Date: | Jun 23 2009 20:30:42 |
________________________________
From: "WILLIAMS, Tim" <Tim.Williams@xxxxxxxxx.gov.uk>
To: UK Tree Care <uktc@xxxxxx.tree-care.info>
Sent: Tuesday, 23 June, 2009 14:16:27
Subject: RE: Statutory undertakers and TPO's
There is no need to fell the tree as either armoured cabling such as ABC
(aerial bundled cable) or shrouding can be used. Shrouding would be a cheap
way to prevent the outages although a clearance of any branches around the
cable would need to be maintained.
§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
clearance of branches around the cable: like this, or maybe not? found in
vancouver.
djc
--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info
The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
reduced-ultimate 2 033.jpg
Description: image/pjpeg
Current thread
- Statutory undertakers and TPO's
Jun 22 2009 11:35:28- RE: Statutory undertakers and TPO's
Jun 22 2009 12:07:47 - RE: Statutory undertakers and TPO's
Jun 22 2009 12:29:15- RE: Statutory undertakers and TPO's
Jun 22 2009 12:45:40- RE: Statutory undertakers and TPO's
Jun 22 2009 13:01:31- RE: Statutory undertakers and TPO's
Jun 22 2009 13:05:33
- RE: Statutory undertakers and TPO's
- RE: Statutory undertakers and TPO's
- RE: Statutory undertakers and TPO's
- Re: Statutory undertakers and TPO's
Jun 22 2009 21:38:15- RE: Statutory undertakers and TPO's
Jun 23 2009 13:17:07- Re: Statutory undertakers and TPO's
Jun 23 2009 20:30:42- RE: Statutory undertakers and TPO's
Jun 24 2009 09:11:46
- RE: Statutory undertakers and TPO's
- Tree Pulling
Jun 24 2009 17:40:49- TRIMBLE GEO XT Use
Jun 24 2009 17:57:25 - Re: Tree Pulling
Jun 24 2009 18:56:40 - Re: Tree Pulling
Jun 24 2009 19:54:05 - Re: Tree Pulling
Jun 24 2009 22:19:08 - Re: Tree Pulling
Jun 24 2009 20:45:28 - Re: Tree Pulling
Jun 25 2009 09:35:54
- TRIMBLE GEO XT Use
- Re: Statutory undertakers and TPO's
- RE: Statutory undertakers and TPO's
- RE: Statutory undertakers and TPO's