Re: BS5837- tree contribution
| Subject: | Re: BS5837- tree contribution |
|
|---|---|---|
| From: | John Gillbert | |
| Date: | Jul 27 2009 11:22:04 |
Bill,
I try to tell clients of the likelihood of planning success, at least in
relation to trees but usually they've already bought the site and the best I
can do is recommend they reduce impingement as much as possible. If
impingement on B or A category trees is inevitable then I might end up
suggesting removal and replacement with large specimens in a well prepared
rooting environment elsewhere that in the mid term would add up to more
crown cover. I stress this is going to be expensive and require maintenance
and supervision and not a very high probability of planning success. As an
Arboricultural consultant in a situation where the client is already
commited this is the best I can do. As you say its down to others to decide
whether the overall benefits of the development outweigh the loss of habitat
continuity and historical amenity value.
Regards John Gillbert
----- Original Message -----
From: <Andersonarb@xxxx.com>
To: "UK Tree Care" <uktc@xxxxxx.tree-care.info> Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2009 7:51 PM Subject: Re: BS5837- tree contribution But no my comment regarding what's a site is not a wind up. I fairly
regularly tell people that their project is a non-starter; think CA, section
211
notice is going to provoke a TPO, good quality noticeable trees that would get B or A cat; it's not a site, "save your money." I'm not saying I actually like the schemes that come across my desk, or that despite them meeting policy that I think they're a good idea. Just that the TPO system could legitimately be used to thwart them and so forgetting the scheme is the best option. I also tell clients when I think the TPO system might be illegitimately used to scupper a project; thus they get a
warning that the scheme is likely to cost them a lot of money and a visit
from
PINS. AFAICT tell an appeal is always gonna be a toss-up and not for me to comment upon anyway. That advice is for a Planning Consultant. Bill. -- The UK Tree Care mailing list To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
Current thread
- BS5837- tree contribution continued
- Re: BS5837- tree contribution
Jul 24 2009 18:10:41- Re: BS5837- tree contribution
Jul 25 2009 16:05:16- RE: BS5837- tree contribution
Jul 25 2009 16:43:27- Re: BS5837- tree contribution
Jul 26 2009 10:12:07 - RE: BS5837- tree contribution
Jul 27 2009 09:44:28
- Re: BS5837- tree contribution
- RE: BS5837- tree contribution
- Re: BS5837- tree contribution
- Re: BS5837- tree contribution
Jul 26 2009 18:51:59- RE: BS5837- tree contribution
Jul 27 2009 08:13:42- Re: BS5837- tree contribution
Jul 27 2009 11:21:58
- Re: BS5837- tree contribution
- Re: BS5837- tree contribution
Jul 27 2009 11:22:04 - Re: BS5837- tree contribution
Jul 27 2009 16:46:30
- RE: BS5837- tree contribution
- Re: BS5837- tree contribution
Jul 26 2009 19:01:00 - Re: BS5837- tree contribution
Jul 27 2009 09:30:47- RE: BS5837- tree contribution
Jul 28 2009 02:39:56
- RE: BS5837- tree contribution
- Re: BS5837- tree contribution
Jul 27 2009 10:03:46 - Re: BS5837- tree contribution
Jul 27 2009 21:55:52- Re: BS5837- tree contribution
Jul 29 2009 10:21:14
- Re: BS5837- tree contribution
- Re: BS5837- tree contribution
Jul 28 2009 07:25:07
- Re: BS5837- tree contribution