Re: RE:
| Subject: | Re: RE: |
|
|---|---|---|
| From: | Bill Kowalczyk | |
| Date: | Aug 03 2009 11:08:38 |
On 2 Aug 2009, at 17:35, Luke Steer wrote:
The brace is still goodand saved the tree from felling; whether it actually needed it ornot. I'verecommended that no further work should be done at this time except re-inspecting it every two years.
Hi Luke, how do you know the brace is "still good"? This is a situation that always worries me.
I've seen failures where cables have snapped, eyes have 'opened up'
or through bolts have broken.
I know that steel degrades (rusts) but by how much and over what period? I've no clue!
How can we be confident of other people's workmanship or materials of
"over thirty years ago"?
I'm also having trouble being confident when I come across trees
where more 'modern' methods have been used.
I've seen claims for a useful life span of 5 or 10 years. How much does support tail off as the materials start to degrade?
or does a metaphorical alarm clock go off, and the system's no longer
"safe"?
Regards, Bill -- The UK Tree Care mailing list To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
Current thread
- [no subject]
Jul 29 2009 15:13:08- Re:
Jul 29 2009 15:26:48 - RE:
Jul 29 2009 15:27:09- RE:
Jul 29 2009 15:55:20- Re:
Jul 29 2009 19:59:46 - RE:
Aug 02 2009 16:36:22- Re: RE:
Aug 03 2009 11:08:38 - RE: RE: Cable Bracing etc.
Aug 05 2009 07:34:56 - Re: RE: Cable Bracing etc.
Aug 05 2009 10:16:25 - Re: Cable Bracing etc.
Aug 05 2009 10:40:19 - RE: Cable Bracing etc.
Aug 06 2009 22:12:57 - Re: Cable Bracing etc.
Aug 07 2009 02:00:44 - Re: Cable Bracing etc.
Aug 07 2009 11:33:18 - Re: Cable Bracing etc.
Aug 07 2009 15:37:21 - RE: Cable Bracing etc.
Aug 07 2009 14:39:08
- Re: RE:
- Re:
- RE:
- Re: