In a message dated 03/08/2009 14:42:46 GMT Standard Time,
Moray.Simpson@xxxxxxxx.gov.uk writes:
Mind you, the remarks in your last sentence sounds uncannily like one of
the North's more prodigious posters.
To paraphrase Private Eye are the two related!!
I do worry that my reports may get a wider circulation than I intend but I
don't recall doing much in Mansfield lately. Also I'd be unlikely to write
a report based entirely on the premise that "it's not fair" I'd have told
the client that it was as fair as the rather inequable system ever gets and
to find another angle or forget it.
At this stage I would admit that I have pointed out to a local LPA that
they can quite happily dish out TPOs with no regard to the BB whatsoever and
their punishment is nil. Meanwhile if your average owner of a TPO'd tree
gives such scant regard to the regs they'll get nobbled for a couple of
kilo-quid. That's certainly not fair.
However I'm sure Sean will have followed the BB's guidance to the letter,
and that this TPO is not just a simple way of foiling someone's otherwise
reasonable planning application.
Bill.
--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info
The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
