Supported by the Arborcentre

UKTC Archive

tree-care.info for tree advice

RE: TreeCareApproved.Org TrustMark For Arboriculture

Subject: RE: TreeCareApproved.Org TrustMark For Arboriculture
From: Chris Hastie
Date: Dec 16 2009 17:52:16 
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, "A.j Clark" wrote:
As a former contractor and as a poster on the "A.N Other" thread
that was left insulted (as previously mentioned) and aggrieved 

Andy, David
I well understand that there are a few around, on both sides, left
aggreived by what went on Arbtalk. I'd really rather that those
feeling weren't brought over to the UKTC though. I am happy to see a
reasoned discussion of the merits of Trustmark, the benefits or
otherwise to contractors, and indeed of the appropriateness or
otherwise of the systems that have been put in place by
treecareapproved.org to assess contractors and consultants alike. I
really don't want to see posts going back over who called whom names
on Arbtalk.
David, that includes not airing your grievances with the Arbtalk
administrator. It should not surprise you to learn that the admins of
the UK's two biggest tree care forums occassionally communicate with
each other, so I am party to both sides of this argument. My opposite
number at Arbtalk has sensibly chosen to keep out of this, but I am
aware that the story told by you here and his recollection are, shall
we say, not entirely consistent.
I have to say that if you asked me to reveal personal information
relating to anyone on this forum the answer would be along the lines
of "sure - just show me the court order". That, of course, assumes
that I know. On the whole I hold relatively little information, almost
all of it not validated or checked in any way. I dare say Arbtalk is
in a similar position. 

--
Chris Hastie




--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/

Current thread