Supported by the Arborcentre

UKTC Archive

tree-care.info for tree advice

RE: PV vs TPO

Subject: RE: PV vs TPO
From: Ian Brewster
Date: Jun 06 2011 12:29:53
______________________________________________________________________
     Want to learn how to fully apply CAVAT tree valuation system?

A full days training course, with the author Christopher Neilan, will be
taking place on the 21st July at Capel Manor College, Enfield, EN1.
To find out more, or to book a place, please call 0845 094 3268.
Places are limited, lunch and refreshments included. Cost: £99.00+ VAT
______________________________________________________________________


'Human nature being what it is there is an incentive to maximise the pay
back although it is inevitably dressed up as "I'm just trying to be
green".

LPAs need to determine applications on the usual balance of private loss
-v- public amenity, but I'd like to see realistic assessments of the
actual reduction in output trees might cause.  I strongly suspect that
most householders don't weigh it against the cost of the tree work
needed to achieve full sun on the panels, especially if the subsidy from
tax payers isn't allowed for.

Simon'

Amenity and being green is great, but how much energy through
manufacture does it take to produce a PV. Include transportation and
installation costs, and all this would add up to a big carbon footprint.
Compare this to the quantity of carbon being sequestered by those trees
affecting PV efficiency. There could be an imbalance however if work by
chainsaw was necessary to alleviate light loss, increasing carbon output
in favour of PV via  Arboricultural operations;
petrol/woodchipping/composting etc.

Having trees that close to a property, casting a shadow onto roof space
(effecting a proposed PV installation) there may be other matters to
consider such as potential for tree related subsidence. Two birds/one
stone.

http://www.arun.gov.uk
NLPG UPRN 100062237016
DX 57406 Littlehampton

Important Notice
This e-mail is intended exclusively for the addressee and may contain 
information that is confidential and/or privileged.
If you are not the intended recipient (or authorised to receive it for the 
addressee), please notify the sender and delete the e-mail immediately; 
using, copying, or disclosing it to anyone else, is strictly prohibited and 
may be unlawful.
Any views, opinions or options presented are solely those of the author and 
do not necessarily represent those of Arun District Council.
The information in this e-mail may be subject to public disclosure under the 
Freedom of Information Act 2000, therefore we cannot guarantee that we will 
not provide the whole or part of this e-mail to a third party.
The Council reserves the right to monitor e-mails in accordance with relevant 
legislation.
Whilst outgoing e-mails are checked for viruses, we cannot guarantee this 
e-mail is virus-free or has not been intercepted or changed and we do not 
accept liability for any damage caused.
Any reference to "e-mail" in this disclaimer includes any attachments.
**********************************************************************




-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

Current thread