UKTC Archive

RE: Councils Carrying Out Tree Inspections on Private Land

Subject: RE: Councils Carrying Out Tree Inspections on Private Land
From: Chris Hastie
Date: Dec 21 2011 13:46:15
From: Jon Heuch [mailto:j.heuch@xxxxxxxxxxx.com]
Sent: 20 December 2011 19:43

B) So Councils can “make money” can they? Only in the best socialist
tradition. Council employees
have huge overheads – without even thinking they must be 100% of total
employee costs (salary +
employers NI + pension + whatever else);

There are all sorts of issues to consider, as several people have pointed 
out. But I'm really not convinced by this one.

It may have been true when Mrs T. started pushing us down the  line of CCT, 
but not anymore. Successive rounds of competition and the increasing squeeze 
on public finances have led councils, at least the well run ones, to look 
very carefully at their organisation and steadily push up efficiency. There 
is no fundamental reason why the public sector cannot work just as 
efficiently as the private sector. The profit motive and competition may be 
the incentive for the private sector, but a very similar set of pressures are 
applied to the public sector by the shrinking budgets. The public sector can, 
and in places does, match the private for efficiency.

Meanwhile, in a industry such as arboriculture, dominated by small practices, 
the public sector has a significant advantage. It has much more buying power. 
Whether buying insurance, IT systems, office furniture or heat and light, 
corporately it is buying a lot of them, and as such is much more able to push 
prices down than the small arb practice. Furthermore, it has sufficient 
demand for support services (IT, admin, HR, finance etc) that it can keep its 
costs down by providing those in house rather than going out to expensive 
agencies. And contrary to what some clearly believe, it is increasingly 
pushed to accounting practices that allow the full cost of each service to be 
seen. The public sector is actually well placed to compete effectively with 
the private, if the will is there to make it happen. And not on some false 
accounting, council tax subsidised basis, but on an equal footing, with all 
costs recovered in fees.

Mike has mentioned over capacity. Again I have to disagree. I believe there 
is a very good reason for council's to look at selling small specialist 
services in the private market place, and that is resilience.

Take a small authority that has enough arb work to justify one arb officer. 
Like most arb officers, (s)he probably feels like (s)he's sinking under the 
load, but just about keeps afloat. Then (s)he goes on leave. Or gets ill. Or 
gets pregnant. With only one officer, there is no resilience in the service. 
You're stuffed. Faced with either letting the service collapse, or buying in 
expensive cover from the private sector.

If you look to take on extra work you can justify, and afford, more staff. 
Hit a blip and you have much more capacity to re-jig things, temporarily cut 
back on the private work you're taking on, and keep going. Looking to private 
work isn't about making use of over-capacity so much as building additional 
demand in order to allow you to boost capacity and provide resilience.



----------------------------------------------------------------------
What's on - www.warwickdc.gov.uk/events
Latest news - www.warwickdc.gov.uk/news
This E-mail, and any attachments, may contain PROTECTED information and is 
intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed.  It may contain 
sensitive or protectively marked material and should be handled accordingly.  
If this E-mail has been misdirected, please notify the author immediately. If 
you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose, distribute, copy, 
print or rely on any of the information contained in it or attached, and all 
copies must be deleted immediately.  Whilst we take reasonable steps to try 
to identify any software viruses, any attachments to this E-mail may 
nevertheless contain viruses which our anti-virus software has failed to 
identify.  You should therefore carry out your own anti-virus checks before 
opening any documents.  Warwick DC will not accept any liability for damage 
caused by computer viruses emanating from any attachment or other document 
supplied with this e-mail. Any opinions expressed in the E-mail are those of 
the individual and not necessarily those of Warwick District Council.
----------------------------------------------------------------------




-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/