RE: Ganoderma applanatum/australe on n.maple - implications
Subject: | RE: Ganoderma applanatum/australe on n.maple - implications |
|
---|---|---|
From: | antony croft | |
Date: | Dec 28 2011 22:12:01 |
Gerrit, Thanks for highlighting that which I neglected to note, that of white oaks. They "resist" Gerrit, but we must plough on! regards Tony
Tony, 1) to be variable in its capacity, largely depending on host species and host vitality. there are some species of tree, with particular attention drawn to Aesculus hippocastinum and variants within which G australes abilities to penetrate reaction zones is frightening and rapid. on oak it is a different animal all together 1) this is true for "white oaks" such as Quercus robur and Q. petrea, not for "red oaks" like Q. rubra (see 2). 2) one standing dead and one living (for a limited timeframe) with g australe (both Aesculus) One willow also dying with ganoderma australe (now in panic mode) so prediction that the tree will soon be dead some time next year (to be confirmed) I have already amassed a library of other cases that illustrate its potential. 2) Over the past 15 years, I have monitored and assessed the damage done by the mycelium of G. australe in over a hundred Quercus rubra, Aesculus, Acer, Salix, Populus and Tilia with (partially) sterile annual or perennial panic fruiting at the base of or up to one metre height on the trunks and almost always the drill of the resistograph went in at zero value resistance. Best, Gerrit
-- The UK Tree Care mailing list To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
Current thread
- Ganoderma applanatum/australe on n.maple - implications continued
- RE: Ganoderma applanatum/australe on n.maple - implications
Dec 22 2011 09:48:34 - RE: Ganoderma applanatum/australe on n.maple - implications
Dec 22 2011 13:05:39 - RE: Ganoderma applanatum/australe on n.maple - implications
Dec 23 2011 11:56:20 - RE: Ganoderma applanatum/australe on n.maple - implications
Dec 23 2011 15:45:21 - RE: Ganoderma applanatum/australe on n.maple - implications
Dec 24 2011 11:15:23 - RE: Ganoderma applanatum/australe on n.maple - implications
Dec 27 2011 19:11:14 - RE: Ganoderma applanatum/australe on n.maple - implications
Dec 27 2011 20:48:14 - RE: Ganoderma applanatum/australe on n.maple - implications
Dec 28 2011 21:59:43 - RE: Ganoderma applanatum/australe on n.maple - implications
Dec 28 2011 22:12:01 - RE: Ganoderma applanatum/australe on n.maple - implications
Dec 28 2011 11:27:03 - RE: Ganoderma applanatum/australe on n.maple - implications
Dec 28 2011 11:51:49 - RE: Ganoderma applanatum/australe on n.maple - implications
Dec 28 2011 21:44:29 - RE: Ganoderma applanatum/australe on n.maple - implications
Dec 29 2011 11:25:27 - RE: Ganoderma applanatum/australe on n.maple - implications
Dec 29 2011 15:45:50 - RE: Ganoderma applanatum/australe on n.maple - implications
Dec 29 2011 17:02:25 - RE: Ganoderma applanatum/australe on n.maple - implications
Dec 29 2011 17:40:32 - RE: Ganoderma applanatum/australe on n.maple - implications
Dec 29 2011 19:10:33
- RE: Ganoderma applanatum/australe on n.maple - implications