Re: BS3998 2010- why not utilised?
| Subject: | Re: BS3998 2010- why not utilised? |
|
|---|---|---|
| From: | Luke Steer | |
| Date: | Jan 29 2012 22:13:37 |
When clients write them into their contracts. Regards Luke Steer Chartered Arboriculturist Treescapes Consultancy Ltd. Tel: 015394 34698 Mobile: 07734 113964 www.treescapesconsultancy.co.uk -----Original Message----- From: antony croft <hamadryad@xxxxxxxx.co.uk> Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 22:11:26 To: UK Tree Care<uktc@xxxxxx.tree-care.info> Reply-To: uktc@xxxxxx.tree-care.info Subject: RE: BS3998 2010- why not utilised? then it is as I thought and not a case of you have to work to that standard and any deviation must be justified? So how can we fight or deal with the poor work standards were seeing both from development and utilities installations? and is it the case that the utilities are aware, but the civil engineers they sub too are not? whats the deal, and when are these standards going to be the norm rather than the exception in application?
From: mark.carter750@xxxxxxxxxxx.com To: uktc@xxxxxx.tree-care.info Subject: RE: BS3998 2010- why not utilised? Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:38:58 +0000-----Original Message----- From: antony croft [mailto:hamadryad@xxxxxxxx.co.uk] Sent: 29 January 2012 14:02 To: UK Tree Care Subject: RE: BS3998 2010- why not utilised? If NJUG4 is a basic minum standard, is it the same with BS3998? if it is and BS 3998 is a basic minimum standard as opposed to"recommended"standards as I am lead to believe does this not make these standards orrather notworking to these minimum standards a matter that is totally indefensible?Tony, One of the changes between BS3998:1984 and the 2010 revision is that it is now recommendations, hence the title 'Tree work - Recommendations'. To my mind that change increases the weight that its guidance carries, but both versions were and are more than a 'minimum standard', they are the national standard. Best regards, Mark Carter MICFor. MRICS M.Arbor.A. Dip. Arb. (RFS) Chartered Arboriculturist, Chartered Surveyor & Registered Consultant of The Institute of Chartered Foresters www.mjctreeservices.co.uk Tel: (02380) 897763 MJC Tree Services Limited, 89 Hampton Lane, Blackfield, Southampton. SO45 1WL Company Registration no. 4154927 Registered Office - 'The Lodge', Oak Lawn, Woodside, Wootton, Isle of Wight -- The UK Tree Care mailing list To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info
The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info
The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
Current thread
- BS3998 2010- why not utilised? continued
- Re: BS3998 2010- why not utilised?
Jan 16 2012 17:25:22- RE: BS3998 2010- why not utilised?
Jan 16 2012 20:02:52 - RE: BS3998 2010- why not utilised?
Jan 17 2012 08:18:01 - RE: BS3998 2010- why not utilised?
Jan 17 2012 10:38:46 - RE: BS3998 2010- why not utilised?
Jan 17 2012 20:29:59 - RE: BS3998 2010- why not utilised?
Jan 29 2012 14:02:36 - RE: BS3998 2010- why not utilised?
Jan 29 2012 21:39:20 - RE: BS3998 2010- why not utilised?
Jan 29 2012 22:11:40 - Re: BS3998 2010- why not utilised?
Jan 29 2012 22:13:37
- RE: BS3998 2010- why not utilised?
- Re: BS3998 2010- why not utilised?
- RE: BS3998 2010- why not utilised?
Jan 16 2012 09:33:52 - RE: BS3998 2010- why not utilised?
Jan 16 2012 09:47:29- Re: BS3998 2010- why not utilised?
Jan 16 2012 22:42:52- Re: BS3998 2010- why not utilised?
Jan 17 2012 09:29:32 - RE: BS3998 2010- why not utilised?
Jan 17 2012 12:35:58- RE: BS3998 2010- why not utilised?
Jan 17 2012 12:49:02
- RE: BS3998 2010- why not utilised?
- Re: BS3998 2010- why not utilised?
- Re: BS3998 2010- why not utilised?