Supported by Bosky Trees

UKTC Archive

tree-care.info for tree advice

RE: Planning Conditions -v- TPO's

Subject: RE: Planning Conditions -v- TPO's
From: luke steer
Date: Mar 12 2012 09:44:31
Hi Ron,
I agree with you in many situations and I've seen too many naff trees 
protected with TPOs when development was proposed.  

However, I've also seen areas that once contained many trees that now have 
few to the detriment of their visual character.  Most were probably not 
exceptional but collectively, over many properties, they created a pleasant 
place.  It occurs to me that CA status reduces this erosion of tree cover.  
How about 'Tree Conservation Areas'?  New legislation and increases in TO 
work load designating them but, potentially, it could help slow the erosion 
of urban tree cover.  I believe that this type of thing occurred with the 
original TPOs in the way that Paul describes.  Currently TPOs may not be the 
correct tools, unless you're prepared to serve an Area Order and re-serve it 
periodically, potentially every five years.  Maybe I'm rambling!  Maybe I 
should do some work!

By the way the ATF meeting was brill and we discussed TPOs there.  If you 
weren't there you missed out!

Best wishes

Luke

-----Original Message-----
From: Howe, Ron [mailto:Ron.Howe@xxxxxxxxxxx.gov.uk] 
Sent: 12 March 2012 08:30
To: UK Tree Care
Subject: RE: Planning Conditions -v- TPO's

I was going to let you all chat on about this but, I have a strong
opinion on this front. We seem to be talking, in general, about not
losing trees and the continuity of tree cover etc. which, is admirable.
However, I really believe that the TPO legislation is there to deal with
'special' and 'important' trees. It should be likened to the listed
Buildings tool ... You don't protect buildings just because they're old
or because buildings are being demolished, unless they are very special.
The tool was delegated to LPAs and we should use it sparingly. We are
told to consider protection in relation to development but again, and as
said by you Paul, we have a conditions tool to deal with the short term
issues of general tree cover and that gives you time to decide if any of
the trees are special enough to use your ultimate tool. It should be
about trees as special features that are prominent to the wider public
or character of an area. Don't devalue the system and don't forget, it's
about people as well.

Ron Howe
Principal Tree Officer
Mole Valley District Council
Tel. 01306 879 286
Website - www.molevalley.gov.uk

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Hawksford [mailto:arborconsulting@xxxx.com] 
Sent: 09 March 2012 20:28
To: UK Tree Care
Subject: Planning Conditions -v- TPO's


What similarities are there between planning conditions (PC's) and TPO's
or Conservation Area Order status? Obviously the fines for a breach are
different, but say a site is subject to a 12 yr old planning condition
and the new owner wishes to remove trees; what are the implications? Are
PC's subject to amenity values or are they simply applied to ensure
continuity of tree cover at the time that the development is
constructed? I understand that PC's should not be used to protect trees,
so what options do I have?
 
Cheers........


Paul Hawksford
Principal Arboriculturist
______________________________

ARBOR CONSULTING - TREE SURVEYS, INSPECTIONS, ADVICE & REPORTS 260 Doury
Road Ballymena County Antrim Northern Ireland
BT43 6TU
______________________________________________________________________
________________

M: +44 (0)7746 817923  

E:  arborconsulting@xxxx.com

W: www.arborconsulting.co.uk


Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
______________________________________________________________________
___

Disclaimer: 

This e-mail communication may be intercepted for regulatory, quality
control, or crime detection purposes as per the Regulation of
Investigatory Powers (RIP) Act. This message is intended only for the
use of authorised person(s) ("the intended recipient") to whom it is
addressed. It may contain information that is privileged and
confidential within the meaning of the applicable law. 
Accordingly any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of
this message or any of its content by any other person may constitute a
breach of civil or criminal law and is strictly prohibited. If you are
not the intended recipient please contact the sender as soon as
possible. ARBOR CONSULTING and/or its associates do not warrant that any
attachments are free from viruses or other defects and accept no
liability for any losses resulting from infected e-mail transmissions. 
______________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________
                                          


--
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/
Have you tried www.molevalley.gov.uk? Our easy to use, accessible website 
allows you to access our services at any time. You can look at planning 
applications, pay bills online or find out more about where you live using 
the Mole Valley and Me feature.

Please note that calls to the Council may be recorded and monitored for 
training purposes. The computer system may also be monitored and recorded to 
secure the effective operation of the system and for other lawful purposes. 
This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use 
of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you are not the 
intended recipient, the E-mail and any files have been transmitted to you in 
error and any copying, distribution or other use of the information contained 
in them is strictly prohibited.




-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/




-- 
The UK Tree Care mailing list
To unsubscribe send mailto:uktc-unsubscribe@xxxxxx.tree-care.info

The UKTC is supported by The Arbor Centre
http://www.arborcentre.co.uk/

Current thread